Friday, 30 August 2013

THE HOLY WATER

Ex. 29:4; Lev. 8:6 - Aaron and his sons were washed inholy water in their consecration to the priesthood. Thus, we see theuse of holy water during the beginning of salvation history.
Ex. 30:18-19 - the Lord requires Aaron and his sons to wash their hands and feet in holy water before they offered sacrifices to Him. TheChurch uses holy water for various purposes, and holy water fonts are generally located at the entrance of Catholic churches to be used before the sacrifice of Christ is offered to the Father.
Num. 5:17 - here again, the priest uses holy water. God uses natural matter to convey the supernatural, just as God who is Spirit became flesh in Christ Jesus.
Num. 8:7 - the Lord says to"sprinkle them with the waterof remission." The Lord uses water, a physical property, to convey His supernatural property of grace.
1 Kings 7:38-39 - in King Solomon's temple, there wereten large basins of holy water. Holy water has alwaysbeen used in the context of worship.
John 9:6-7 – Jesus uses clayand spittle to heal the blind man’s eyes, and ordered himto wash in the pool of Siloam to effect the cure. Jesus did not need to use spittle, clay and water, but He does to demonstrate that God uses the material things He created to give graces and heal us.
John 13:4-10 - the Lord useswater to wash the apostles' feet to prepare them for theirsacramental priesthood.
John 19:34 - water and bloodflowed from Jesus' pierced side on the Cross. The Church uses holy water as a symbol of our Lord's life giving water that flowed fromHis sacred Heart, and as the property which brings about the power of Jesus Christ Himself, in baptism, the Eucharist, and other sacred rites of the Church.

THE HOLY ROSARY A VAIN AND CHILDISH REPETITIOUS PRAYER?


"But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking": Matt 6:7 (KJV).

The Rosary? God hates that! Go read Matt 6:7 ! Where is it in the Bible? I'm sure everyone of us devout Catholics reading this have encountered these sort of creatures who reek deep hatred of anything about the Virgin Mary and Catholic ..both in person or online especially in debate groups, but how can we reason to them that in our Church tradition the Holy Rosary was given by Our Lady to Saint Dominic? Where their mind set is, they don't believe in the Virgin Mary and Saint Dominic in the first place? for them the Virgin Mary is dead and she can't hear our prayers anymore..dead as a dead dog..period..and the only acceptable answers for them must be verses in their heavily mutilated 66 books Protestant Bible (Catholic Bible have 73 books)..BUT HOW CAN I REASONS WITH THE ANTI CATHOLICS? THEY SEEM TO BE SO GOOD AND WELL ADEPT WITH BIBLE! lets check:

But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking (KJV).

And when you are praying, speak not much, as the heathens. For they think that in their much speaking they may be heard (Douay).

In praying, don’t use vain repetitions, as the Gentiles do; for they think that they will be heard for their much speaking (WEB).

In praying, do not babble like the pagans, who think that they will be heard because of their many words (NAB).

And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their many words (NASB).

In your prayers do not babble as the gentiles do, for they think that by using many words they will make themselves heard (NJB).

In fairness, both the Revised Standard Version and the New International Version avoid the word “repetition”; many Catholics use a Catholic edition of RSV. In general, though, if it says “vain/meaningless repetition”, it’s a Protestant Bible.

The Greek word beneath this conflict is battalogeō, “to stammer”. Supposedly derived from the name of a Cyrenean king who stuttered, or from the name of a bad poet, battalogeō can indicate repetition. It can also indicate babbling, the endless blathering of the crashing bore that’s cornered you at a cocktail party or the presentation at work you just can’t get out of except by faking major trauma.

Babbling and repetition — not quite the same thing, even if described by the same word. Fortunately, though, there’s another word in the verse that helps us decide the issue: polylogia. Created from the stem polys (many) and logos (word), it’s often translated as “much speaking”, a clumsily imported construct; a better single word to capture the idea is “verbosity”. In speaking of this verse, St. Augustine of Hippo wrote, “And in reality, every kind of much speaking comes from the Gentiles, who make it their endeavour to exercise the tongue rather than to cleanse the heart” (On the Sermon on the Mount 2:3:12).

St. John Chrysostom points us to the parable of the widow and the unjust judge (Lk 18:1-8), which like the simile of the importunate friend (Lk 11:5-8) emphasizes the need for persistence in prayer (Homilies on Matthew 19:5). We are not merely to ask, seek or knock, but to keep asking, keep seeking and keep knocking (Mt 7:7; Lk 11:9). Common sense should tell you that, if you’re to ask for something not just once but continually, you’ll repeat yourself in essence even if you manage to say your prayer a different way each time.

Moreover, Jesus follows this injunction with the instruction, “Pray like this” … and gives us the Our Father (Mt 6:9-13), not only for its own sake but also as a model for other prayers. As a model, its unique feature is its brevity, giving praise to God and asking for our needfuls in just over fifty words. Not quite what we Catholics call an aspiration (a traditional prayer that can be said in one breath), but definitely stripped down to essentials.

Given the context and the rest of Jesus’ teachings about prayer, babble translates battalogeō in this verse much more effectively and reasonably, capturing the emptiness and futility of the prophets of Baal crying to their god as they cut themselves (1 Kgs 18:25-29). It also captures the annoying quality of the Christian who makes a complete hash out of the simple act of saying grace at a large gathering by gassing on about all the things the assembled should be grateful for while the gravy congeals and the butter melts.

JUST REMEMBER THESE (JESUS AND THE BIBLE ITSELF SUPPORT REPETITIOUS PRAYERS)

Jesus gave us the "Our Father" prayer which most Protestant Christians pray with no qualms about praying "in vain." The same command in Luke 11:2 reads: "And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father..." -- "when you pray, say..."

That Christ Himself prayed in repetitions. Matthew 26:44: "And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words". Mark 14:39 reads: "And again he went away, and prayed, and spake the same words."

That the angels pray repetitiously. Revelation 4:8: "...and they rest not day and night, saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come."

That God commanded Moses to tell the Israelites: "Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God is one LORD: And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might. And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart: And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up." (Deuteronomy 6:4-7)

That the Psalms are nothing but a collection of prayers and litanies which were prayed formally in the pre-Christian synagogues and early Christian churches, are still prayed in synagogues and Catholic churches today -- and were even prayed by Christ from the Cross.

for example: the endless repetition of PRAISING THE LORD!

Psalm 136:1-26
Praise the LORD, who is so good;
God's love endures forever;
Praise the God of gods;
God's love endures forever;
. . . Praise the God of heaven,
God's love endures forever.

That the liturgy of the synagogue was (and is) filled with repetition and formalized prayer. Christ said "use not vain repetitions, as the heathens do". Were the Jews heathens? They prayed (and still pray) the sh'ma twice a day and, in their liturgy, the Shemoneh Esrei, the Kaddish, the morning blessings, the Aleinu, etc. Check out a Jewish siddur (missal) sometime; does it look more typically Protestant or Catholic?

That hymns are prayers. Is it "vain" to sing "Amazing Grace" or "The Old Rugged Cross" more than once?

In addition, the earliest Christians (being Catholics) understood Christ's words as do modern Catholics. The 1st century Didache (The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles) says:

Do not pray like the hypocrites, but rather as the Lord commanded in His Gospel, like this:

Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven. Give us today our daily bread, and forgive us our debt as we also forgive our debtors. And bring us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one; for Thine is the power and the glory for ever..

Pray this three times each day.

THE HAIL MARY WHERE IS THAT IN THE BIBLE?

Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with you.

Luke 1:28 "And coming to her, he said, "Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you."

The Greek kecharitomene means favored by grace, graced. Its tense suggests a permanent state of being "highly favored," thus full of grace. Charity, the divine love within us, comes from the same root. God is infinite Goodness, infinite Love. Mary is perfect created goodness, filled to the limit of her finite being with grace or charity.

Blessed art thou among women

Luke 1:41-42a "When Elizabeth heard Mary's greeting, the infant leaped in her womb, and Elizabeth, filled with the holy Spirit, cried out in a loud voice and said, "Most blessed are you among women..."

Luke 1:48 "For he has looked upon his handmaid's lowliness; behold, from now on will all ages call me blessed."

Among all women is a way to say the highest/greatest etc. of a group in Semitic languages (these words would likely have been spoken in Aramaic). Mary is being called the greatest of all women, greater than Ruth, greater than Sarah, greater than EVE! Since Eve was created immaculate (without original sin), Mary must have been conceived immaculate. And, although Eve fell into sin by her own free will, Mary must have corresponded to God's grace and remained sinless. She could not otherwise be greater than Eve. Thus, as the Fathers of the Church unanimously assert, Mary is the New Eve who restores womanhood to God's original intention and cooperates with the New Adam, her Son, for the Redemption of the world.

Blessed is the fruit of your womb, Jesus

Luke 1:42b "and blessed is the fruit of your womb."

Jesus is Mary's fruit. Good fruit does not come from anything but a good tree (Mt. 7:17-18)! The all-holy Son of God could not be the fruit of any other tree than the Immaculate Virgin.

Holy Mary, Mother of God

Luke 1:43 "And how does this happen to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?

Kyrios is the Greek word used by the Jews in the Septuagint Bible (Greek translation) for Yhwh, the Divine Name of God. In her greeting of Mary, Elizabeth is saying: "How is it that the mother of my God should come to me." Against the heresies of the 4th and 5th centuries which tried to split the Person of Jesus into two, divine and human, denying one or the other, the Council of Ephesus in 431 AD proclaimed Mary Theotokos (God-bearer, i.e. mother of God). Jesus is a single Person, a Divine Person, the 2nd Person of the Most Holy Trinity. To be mother of the Person Jesus is to be mother of a Person who is God. Mary's title protects this truth against errors which emphasize or deny, either the divinity or humanity of the Lord.

Pray for us sinners, now and at the hour of our death. Amen.

Luke 2:35 "...and you yourself a sword will pierce so that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed."

John 2:5 "His mother said to the servers, "Do whatever he tells you."

Mary sees a need and appeals to Her Son to satisfy it. He does. We turn to Mary to ask her to intercede with her Son in our daily spiritual and material needs, but especially at the hour of our death. At that moment our salvation hangs in the balance as the devil makes his final foray to deter us from the path to God (Rev. 2:10). It is not surprising, therefore, that both the Hail Mary and the Our Father conclude with an appeal to be delivered from the evil one.

THE HOLY ROSARY AS A POWERFUL INTERCESSORY PRAYER

The Power of Intercessory Prayer in the Bible:

Intercessory prayer proceeds from faith in God that holy men and women who have died are as alive today as they were on earth (Luke 20:38). If the prayer of the just man avails much, how much more the prayer of the one made perfect (Rev. 21:27) and living with God in heaven (the patriarchs, apostles and other holy men and women).

James 5:16b "the fervent prayer of a righteous man is very powerful."

Rev. 5:8 "When he took it, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb. Each of the elders held a harp and gold bowls filled with incense, which are the prayers of the holy ones.

The angels, too, mediate our prayers. This is taught explicitly in the Jewish book of Tobit (Tob. 12:12), accepted by Christians as inspired until Luther on his own authority rejected it. It remains part of the Catholic Bible.

Tobit 12:12 I can now tell you that when you, Tobit, and Sarah prayed, it was I who presented and read the record of your prayer before the Glory of the Lord; and I did the same thing when you used to bury the dead.

Rev. 8:3 "Another angel came and stood at the altar, holding a gold censer. He was given a great quantity of incense to offer, along with the prayers of all the holy ones, on the gold altar that was before the throne."


source:tonylane/kingjamesonline.org/fisheaters.com/EWTN Library


Photo:Virgin of the Rosary of Guápulo, Peruvian (Cuzco), ca. 1680


WR


ABORTION AND THE BIBLE

It is sinful to perform or even to support abortion:
Exodus 1:15-17; 2Kings 8:12;2Kings 15:16; Psalm 5:6; Psalm 10:2-11; Psalm 94:20-21; Proverbs 1:10-11;Proverbs 6:16-19; Proverbs 29:10; Isaiah 13:18; Isaiah 57:4-5; Isaiah 59:7; Hosea 4:2; Amos 1:13; Wisdom 1:12-14; Wisdom 14:22-26; Sirach 8:7; 1John 3:15; Revelation 9:21; Revelation 21:8.

Saturday, 27 July 2013

THE POPES OF THE CHURCH


The Catholic Church was founded 33AD by Our Lord Jesus Christ upon Peter this year's pentecost sunday 2013 makes it 1980 years old, and during this period here are our Popes read what that 4th Pope, Clement, wrote about apostolic succession here). St. Peter (32-67) St. Linus (67-76) St. Anacletus (76-88) St. Clement I (88-97) St. Evaristus (97-105) St. Alexander I (105-115) St. Sixtus I(115-125) St. Telesphorus (125-136)St. Hyginus (136-140) St. Pius I (140-155) St. Anicetus (155-166) St. Soter (166-175) St. Eleutherius (175-189) St. Victor I (189-199) St. Zephyrinus (199-217) St. Callistus I (217-22) St. Urban I (222-30) St. Pontain (230-35) St. Anterus (235-36) St. Fabian (236-50) St. Cornelius (251-53) St. Lucius I (253-54) St. Stephen I (254-257) St. Sixtus II (257-258) St. Dionysius (260-268) St. Felix I (269-274) St. Eutychian (275-283) St. Caius (283-296) St. Marcellinus (296-304) St. Marcellus I (308-309) St. Eusebius(309 or 310) St. Miltiades (311-14) St. Sylvester I (314-35) St. Marcus (336) St. Julius I (337-52) Liberius (352-66) St. Damasus I (366-83) St.Siricius (384-99) St. Anastasius I (399-401)St. Innocent I (401-17)St. Zosimus (417-18) St. Boniface I (418-22)St. Celestine I (422-32)St. Sixtus III (432-40) St. Leo I (the Great) (440-61) St. Hilarius (461-68) St. Simplicius (468-83) St. Felix III (II) (483-92) St. Gelasius I (492-96) Anastasius II (496-98) St. Symmachus (498-514) St. Hormisdas (514-23) St.John I (523-26) St. Felix IV (III) (526-30) Boniface II (530-32) John II (533-35) St. Agapetus I (535-36) St. Silverius (536-37) Vigilius (537-55) Pelagius I (556-61) John III (561-74) Benedict I (575-79) Pelagius II (579-90) St.Gregory I (590-604) Sabinian (604-606) Boniface III (607) St. Boniface IV (608-15) St. Deusdedit (615-18)Boniface V (619-25) Honorius I (625-38) Severinus (640) John IV (640-42) Theodore I(642-49) St. Martin I (649-55) St. Eugene I (655-57) St. Vitalian (657-72) Adeodatus (II) (672-76) Donus (676-78) St. Agatho (678-81) St. Leo II (682-83) St. Benedict II(684-85) John V (685-86) Conon (686-87) St. Sergius I (687-701) John VI (701-05) John VII (705-07) Sisinnius (708) Constantine (708-15) St. Gregory II(715-31) St. Gregory III(731-41) St. Zachary (741-52) Stephen II (752) 3 Stephen III (752-57) St. Paul I (757-67) Stephen IV (767-72) Adrian I (772-95) St. Leo III (795-816) Stephen V (816-17) St. Paschal I (817-24) Eugene II (824-27) Valentine (827) Gregory IV (827-44) Sergius II (844-47) St. Leo IV (847-55) Benedict III (855-58) St. Nicholas I (858-67) Adrian II (867-72) John VIII (872-82) Marinus I (882-84) St. Adrian III (884-85) Stephen VI (885-91) Formosus (891-96) Boniface VI (896) Stephen VII (896-97) Romanus (897) Theodore II (897)John IX (898-900) Benedict IV (900-03) Leo V (903) Sergius III (904-11) Anastasius III(911-13) Lando (913-14) John X (914-28) Leo VI (928) Stephen VIII (929-31) John XI (931-35) Leo VII (936-39) Stephen IX(939-42) Marinus II (942-46) Agapetus II (946-55) John XII (955-63) Leo VIII (963-64) Benedict V (964) John XIII (965-72) Benedict VI (973-74) Benedict VII (974-83) John XIV (983-84) John XV (985-96) Gregory V (996-99) Sylvester II (999-1003) John XVII (1003) John XVIII (1003-09) Sergius IV (1009-12) Benedict VIII(1012-24) John XIX (1024-32) Benedict IX (1032-45) Sylvester III(1045) Benedict IX (1045) Gregory VI (1045-46) Clement II (1046-47) Benedict IX (1047-48) Damasus II (1048) St. Leo IX (1049-54) Victor II (1055-57) Stephen X (1057-58) Nicholas II (1058-61) Alexander II(1061-73) St. Gregory VII (1073-85) Blessed Victor III (1086-87) Blessed Urban II (1088-99) Paschal II (1099-1118) Gelasius II(1118-19) Callistus II (1119-24) Honorius II (1124-30) Innocent II (1130-43) Celestine II (1143-44) Lucius II (1144-45) Bl. Eugene III (1145-53) Anastasius IV (1153-54) Adrian IV (1154-59) Alexander III(1159-81) Lucius III (1181-85) Urban III (1185-87) Gregory VIII (1187) Clement III (1187-91) Celestine III (1191-98) Innocent III (1198-1216) Honorius III (1216-27) Gregory IX (1227-41) Celestine IV (1241) Innocent IV (1243-54) Alexander IV (1254-61) Urban IV (1261-64) Clement IV (1265-68) Blessed Gregory X (1271-76) Blessed Innocent V (1276) Adrian V (1276)John XXI (1276-77) Nicholas III (1277-80) Martin IV (1281-85) Honorius IV (1285-87) Nicholas IV (1288-92) St. Celestine V (1294) Boniface VIII (1294-1303) Bl. Benedict XI (1303-04) Clement V (1305-14) John XXII (1316-34) Benedict XII (1334-42) Clement VI (1342-52) Innocent VI (1352-62) Blessed Urban V (1362-70) Gregory XI (1370-78) Urban VI (1378-89) Boniface IX (1389-1404) Innocent VII (1406-06) Gregory XII (1406-15) Martin V (1417-31) Eugene IV (1431-47) Nicholas V (1447-55) Callistus III (1455-58) Pius II (1458-64) Paul II (1464-71) Sixtus IV (1471-84) Innocent VIII(1484-92) Alexander VI (1492-1503) Pius III (1503) Julius II (1503-13) Leo X (1513-21) Adrian VI (1522-23) Clement VII (1523-34) Paul III (1534-49) Julius III (1550-55) Marcellus II (1555) Paul IV (1555-59) Pius IV (1559-65) St. Pius V (1566-72) Gregory XIII (1572-85) Sixtus V (1585-90) Urban VII (1590) Gregory XIV (1590-91) Innocent IX (1591) Clement VIII (1592-1605) Leo XI (1605) Paul V (1605-21) Gregory XV (1621-23) Urban VIII (1623-44) Innocent X (1644-55) Alexander VII (1655-67) Clement IX (1667-69) Clement X(1670-76) Bl. Innocent XI (1676-89) Alexander VIII (1689-91) Innocent XII (1691-1700) Clement XI (1700-21) Innocent XIII (1721-24) BenedictXIII (1724-30) Clement XII (1730-40) Benedict XIV (1740-58) Clement XIII (1758-69) Clement XIV (1769-74) Pius VI (1775-99) Pius VII (1800-23) Leo XII (1823-29) Pius VIII (1829-30) Gregory XVI (1831-46) Blessed PiusIX (1846-78) Leo XIII (1878-1903) St. Pius X (1903-14) Benedict XV (1914-22) Pius XI (1922-39) Pius XII (1939-58) Blessed John XXIII (1958-63) Paul VI (1963-78) JohnPaul I (1978) John Paul II (1978—2005) Benedict XVI (2005-2013) Francis I (2013-?) St. Peter was martyred in Rome in A.D. 67 by crucifixion, asking to be crucified upside-down 2 because he felt unworthy to be crucified in the same way as our Lord. His body was buried on Vatican Hill, at the present site of St. Peter's Basilica. You can read about his (and Paul's) martyrdom in Rome in Book II, Chapter 25 of"Church History" written by the above- mentioned Eusebius of Caesaria . The evidence of post-New Testament Church history is just as convincing. Read what the early Eastern Church fathers wrote about Peter and his successors...

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

THE MASS

Welcome to a brief explanation of
the "Mass" (or the "Eucharist" ). This
is a short but in depth look at the
largely unknown treasure of the
Roman Catholic Mass. The Mass is
described as the most powerful prayer on earth. That is because it is
the Prayer and Sacrifice of Jesus
Christ the "Lamb of God" on Mount
Calvary nearly two thousand years
ago. His sacrifice is made present on
the altar under the appearance of "Bread and Wine". At the end of
Mass we can receive Jesus raised
from the dead into
our souls.the Lamb of God on the 21
st of August 1879 with St Joseph,
Our Lady, St John the Evangelist and a multitude of Angels. The Mass our
Treasure and the Lamb's Sacrifice
and Supper Adam and Eve Eve stole
God's fruit from the tree and gave it
to Adam to eat and so helped cause
the "Fall" of mankind,. But in the "Redemption" the New Adam Jesus
sacrifices ( offers back to the
Father ) the Divine Fruit ( Himself )
on the Tree of the Cross at Calvary
and in the Mass Jesus the New Adam
and the Divine Fruit gives Himself to the Church which is the New Eve for
her to Eat. At His Last Supper Jesus
first gave Himself to the Church and
on the following morning He was
put on the Tree of the Cross. At the
foot of the Tree of the Cross Mary the human New Eve offered the
Sacrifice of Jesus the New Adam to
God for the sins of mankind. Jesus in
the Mass gave His one Sacrifice to
the Church the Mystical New Eve for
her to offer back to the Father through time until the End of time.
Beneath the Tree of the Cross Mary
offered the sacrifice of Jesus to God
and the Church also offers His
sacrifice on Calvary to God in the
Sacrifice of the Mass. The most powerful prayer for Mercy
on earth and in Heaven. Mass is the
most powerful prayer we can make.
We can pray to God at any time and
anywhere but at Mass we
can pray to God, with God and in God dying on the cross at Calvary
nearly 2,000 years ago. At the
"consecration"
of Mass God makes Good Friday
present on the altar. At Mass we can
offer the sufferings and Sacrifice of Jesus who is the "Lamb Of God" to
God the Father in atonement for the
Sins of the World. Later on then in
the Mass we can also receive Jesus
risen from the dead really present
in the Sacrament of Holy Communion. ("Sacrifices go up,
Sacraments come down" Fr Joseph
Moran) At "Mass" we enter Heaven
with Jesus in the presence of all the
Angels and Saints as He offered
Himself to the Father on Good Friday 2,000 years ago. Briefly let us
look at the main stages of the Mass.
Repentance We first repent of our
sins. At the start of Mass we repent
of all our sins by praying the
Confiteor, "I confess" or similar prayers. (Mortal or Grave sins
(These are very serious deadly sins.)
need the "Sacrament of Confession"
and the lesser "venial" sins are
forgiven by sincere prayer.) Word
of God Then we hear the "Word of God" in the Scripture Readings
which nourishes us and the priest
explains them in his Homily. Jesus is
really present speaking to us in His
word. Offertory Soon after this
follows the Offertory where we can offer ourselves and all mankind (the
living, the dying and the souls in
Purgatory) in union with the bread
and wine being offered by the priest
to God. The drop of water the priest
adds to the chalice is a symbol of our offering of ourselves and all
Mankind. The Holy Spirit will soon at
the "Consecration" change the bread
and wine into the real Body and
Blood, Soul and Divinity of Jesus
Christ the victim of Calvary. Consecration After the "Offertory"
follows the Consecration which
means: to make Holy. So at the
"Offertory" we offered ourselves to
God and now we can unite our self-
offering to the self- offering of Jesus at Calvary on Good Friday. We pray
that the Holy Spirit will change our
hearts and the hearts of all those we
are offering into better members of
the Mystical Body of Christ.
Jesus through the words of the priest sends the Holy Spirit down to
make the bread and wine into His
Sacrifice of Himself. At the Last
Supper Jesus totally
offered Himself and His passion to
the Father and now the Consecration makes His Self-offering
present. (St Faustina in her diary
(No 684) recounts how she saw
Jesus at the Last Supper at the
moment He cosecrated the bread
and wine and she could see His total offering of Himself). Usually the
Altar Server rings the bell to help us
to focus on this Great Miracle and
usually all present kneel down. The
Body and Blood of Jesus are now in
the two separate vessels (Ciborioum and Chalice) on the Altar signifying
for us the way that the Blood of
Jesus separated from his Flesh as He
bled and died on the cross. The Holy
Spirit can help change our hearts
and everyone that we offer at this time. This can be a time of great
mercy for the world. We can unite
our daily good deeds and sufferings
now with Jesus on the cross to give
them more value and power before
the throne of God. Elijah's great miracle on Mount Carmel (See 1
Kings 18;17-38) where the Fire from
Heaven consumed the offering was
a symbol of this part of the Mass.
Our Father After we say what is
called the great "Amen" in reply to the Priest's "Through Him, With Him
and in Him" prayer we then say the
"Our Father" to sum up all our
petitions. We should try to
remember that we are saying it in
the presence of Heaven. At the Last Supper Jesus probably said the "Our
Father" with His Apostles. Jesus by
His Passion, Death and Resurrection
Lived and fulfilled each of the seven
petitions of the "Our Father". He
obtained for us this privilege of calling God "Our Father". The
Passion of Jesus was the Greatest
Prayer He taught His followers. In
His Passion Jesus "Hallowed" the
Name of His Father. In His Passion
He started the coming of the Father's "Kingdom" (which is also
His Church). He showed us how to
do the "will" of God as it is done in
Heaven. Through His Passion, death
and Ressurection Jesus who is
Himself the "Bread of Life" made Himself present in "Holy
Communion" as the "daily Bread" of
His followers. By His Passion He
obtained "Forgiveness for our
Tresspasses" and the graces we
need to be freed from "Temptation" and "Delivered from evil". At the
Mass we are present as Jesus
perfectly fulfilled the "Our Father"
for us. The Sign of Peace The Priest
may now ask us to offer the "Sign of
Peace" to those near us but more especially we should offer it in our
heart to anyone in our lives we
have not forgiven or do not like.
"Take and Eat" The first Adam was
told not to take and eat God's fruit
from the tree but now Jesus the God-Man as the New Adam gives
mankind Himself because He is
Divine Fruit from the Cross. The first
Adam must have told Eve not to eat
the fruit from the tree ( She was not
created when God told Adam not to eat from the tree ) but now the New
Adam tells the Church which is the
New Eve to "Take and Eat"
the New Fruit which we call Holy
Commuinion. The Resurrection Then
after we say the "Lamb of God" prayers the Priest adds a fragment
of the "Host" (Christ's Body) to the
chalice of His Precious Blood. This
action signifies the Resurrection of
Jesus and shows us that Jesus is
present "risen" from the dead in the Host and the Chalice. We can now
receive Jesus "risen from the dead"
into our hearts in Holy Communion.
St Paul in 1 Cor11: 27-29 seems to
have believed in this real presence
of Jesus in Holy Communion because he said "the person who eats and
drinks without recognising the Body
is eating and drinking his own
condemnation." Mission At the end
of Mass we are sent on a mission "to
love and serve the Lord". One of the best ways to do this is to love and
serve the Lord in our neighbours.
We can imitate Mary who after she
had received Jesus at the
"Annunciation" brought Him to visit
her cousin Elizabeth. The word "Mass" comes from the Latin word
"Missa" which means sent as we are
now "sent" on mission at the end of
Mass. It is good to spend some time
thanking the Holy Trinity for their
goodness to us. Prayers we can say during the
Consecration. Jesus taught these
prayers to St Faustina for the Divine
Mercy Chaplet which is said on
Rosary Beads. "Eternal Father we
offer you the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of your dearly Beloved
Son our Lord Jesus Christ in
atonement for our sins and those of
the whole world." "For the sake of
His sorrowful passion, have mercy
on us and on the whole world."

THE MASS IS NOT AN ENTERTAINMENT GROUND NEITHER FOR EUPHORIA

Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Q: What books are not found in Protestant Bible? By CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY.

A: They are Tobias, Judith, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, ­ Baruch and the two Books of Machabees, together with fragments of Esther (x.4; xvi, 24), and Daniel (iii, 24-90; xii., xiv). These books were contained in the Alexandrian list or Canon of Books which was used by Greek- speaking Jews of Alexandria, Asia Minor, Greece and Italy. © Edited and compiled by the owner of www.archlegend.tk |CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY |

NINE WAYS TO PARTAKE IN SOMEONE'S SIN. By CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY

1. By counsel 2. By command 3. By consent 4. By provocation 5. By praise or flattery 6. By concealment 7. By partaking 8. By silence 9. By defense of the illdone When you meditate on the above it will give you insight how imperfect we are in life and how the church has brought it out to assist us in gaining perfection. One that baffle is partaking, I want to know if a politician steals and donates to the church does this also mean we are partaker. If someone steals from the harvest and you do not report it both partaking and concealing. We see women who are promiscuously dressed and the next thing is you look good,where did you buy this dress, see how nice your shoes are (high heels that help to exhibit your immorality when you walk), oh where did you buy this hair itis made perfectly for you. Meanwhile you will not put on any of these dress but you have partaken in them by flattering. . We must all be careful the way we keep silent especially when things are going wrong as for me I will always speak out. It is different if you are not aware but if you have the knowledge and allow all to go astray it will be dangerous Giving consent to our children to cheat in exam both in school and catechism. How many of us are leading women astray, how many of us are leading the youth astray, how many of us are defending our children when they wrong? We flatter our wives and conceal the truth of the church because we cannot meet up with it. You still suffer it in future because what you sow you will reap. Twist the Bible to suit our ego and counsel wrongly. My dear this is scarely. All these 9 ways are what you see preached for in many churches because truth will drive the congregation and therefore there will be no money. And the result is anti Christ taking over the society. Look at the 9 ways critically they all have multiple meanings, print it in your heart/on the wall of your house and allow these to be your guiding principles. This is the church nine ways and I agree perfectly with them and it is inspired. Beautiful church, beautiful gift from God only when you follow the truth you will enjoy it. © Edited and compiled by the owner of www.archlegend.tk |CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY |

Q: Why did Pope John XXIII convoke Vatican Council II? By CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY

A: His intention in convoking Vatican Council II as the twenty-first worldwide council(a council of the bishops of the entire Church) was to renew the life of the Church, to reform structures and institutions that needed updating, and to discover ways and means of promoting unity among all Christians. Pope John used the Italian word aggiornamento in stating his purpose for Vatican Council II. Its general meaning is "to bring up to date," "to renew,""to revitalize." The word is descriptive of the processes of spiritual renewal and institutional reform and change in the Church judged necessary by Vatican CouncilII. In his opening speech to the Ecumenical Council of Vatican II, Pope John said that the first need in calling the council was "to assert once again the Magisterium, which is unfailing and perdures until the end of time." The"magisterium" means the teaching authority of the Church. How unfortunate that, after this council, the magisterium, the teaching authority of the Church, was so often ignored even by some who said they spoke "in the spirit of Vatican II" orthe "spirit of Pope John." In calling the council, Pope John noted that he looked to the past, to listen to its voice. He declared that it was the principal duty of the council to defend and to advance the truth.The council was to be loyal to the sacred patrimony of truth, as received from the fathers, but to see ever new avenues by which to take the same, true faith of Christ to the world. He insisted that the Catholic Church would continue to oppose errors, but that its opposition must be treated with the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity. He sought ever greater unity in sanctity, and great joy in the eventual union of all the Christian churches of the world. Thus the reform and change that Pope John sought in calling the council was in no way to change the faith and morals of the Catholic Church. His idea was to develop no new doctrine but a new way to make the constant unchangeable faith in Christ — as given the apostles in the sacred deposit of faith — ever more effective in the lives of people and for the evangelization of the entire world. © Edited and compiled by the owner of www.archlegend.tk |CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY |

REPENT!

" Nothing but leaves; the Spirit grieves Over a wasted life; Sin committed while conscience slept, Promises made, but never kept, Hatred, battle, and strife; Nothing but leaves! Nothing but leaves; no garnered sheaves Of life’s fair, ripened grain; Words, idle words, for earnest deeds; We sow our seeds,—lo! tares and weeds: We reap, with toil and pain, Nothing but leaves! Nothing but leaves; memory weaves No veil to screen the past: As we retrace our weary way, Counting each lost and misspent day, We find, sadly, at last, Nothing but leaves! And shall we meet the Master so, Bearing our withered leaves? The Savior looks for perfect fruit, We stand before Him, humbled, mute; Waiting the words He breathes,— “Nothing but leaves?” © Edited and compiled by the owner of www.archlegend.tk |CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY |

What is Papal Infallibility?

By CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY. A: Papal infallibility refers to the pope's protection from error when speaking "ex cathedra". As proclaimed by the First Vatican Council (emphasis added): "But since in this very age, in which the salutary efficacy of the apostolic duty is especially required, not a few are found who disparage its authority, We deem it most necessary to assert solemnly the prerogative which the Only-begotten Son of God deigned to enjoin with the highest pastoral office. And so We, adhering faithfully to the tradition received from the beginning of the Christian faith, to the glory of God, our Savior, the elevation of the Catholic religion and the salvation of Christian peoples, withthe approbation of the sacred Council, teach and explain that the dogma has been divinely revealed: that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when carrying out the office of pastor and teacher of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority he defines a doctrine regarding faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter, possesses that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer willed that His Church be endowed for defining doctrine regarding faith and morals; and so such definitions of the Roman Pontiff of themselves, and not from the consensus of the Church, are irreformable. But if anyone presumes to contradict this definition of Ours, which may God forbid: let him be anathema." (Vatican Council I, 1870 A.D.) Why is Infallibility Necessary? "33,000 Christian Denominations" If not for papal infallibility, there would be no certainty in matters of faith - all we would have is our fallible private judgment - and it is abundantly clear from the many clashing Protestant sects what a poor guide this is. If not for papal infallibility, we would have no means of knowing what is true and what is not. We could have no finality of doctrine and each person would be left to believe whatever he or she "felt" was right. As a result, there would be error, disunity, rejection of truths, adoption of errors, etc. We wouldn't even have a Bible since there would be no infallible authority to determine the canon of Scripture. We could never be sure that our beliefs corresponded with truth, and we could never be sure we were on the true path leading to salvation. Is Infallibility Scriptural? Besides being solemnly proclaimed by the First Vatican Council and being consistently maintained by tradition, the dogma of papal infallibility has abiblical basis. For example, In Matthew 16:18, we are told that"the gates of hell shall not prevail" against the Church. Clearly, the One who is Truth itself must have secured a means to preserve truth in His Church against the gates of hell and against the prince of lies. We are also told in Matthew 28:20 that Christ will be "with you always, until the end of the age". How could this be if the Church was teaching error? And, how could the Church be "the pillar and foundation of truth" (1 Tm. 3:15) if she taught error? And furthermore, the protection of the Holy Spirit is clearly promised in Scripture:"And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate to be with you always, the Spirit of truth, which the world cannot accept, because it neither sees nor knows it. But you know it, because it remains with you, and will be in you." (Jn. 14:16-17) It is clear from Scripture that Christ's Church will be protected from error; and history proves that papal infallibility -and Christ's promises - have never failed. What Are Some Limits of Infallibility? Papal infallibility is a"negative assurance" that protects against formally teaching false doctrine. It does not mean that all utterances of the pope are infallible or that everything a pope says or does is free from error and good for the Church. It also does not mean that a pope is free from sin. Infallibility does not extend to the pope as an individual, but resides in his office as Supreme Pastor. Papal infallibility is limited in scope and does NOT... * extend to anything prior to one's being elected pope *prevent a pope from sinning *extend to every doctrinal matter (it is limited to instances"when carrying out the office of pastor and teacher of all Christians, by virtue ofhis supreme apostolic authority [the Pope] defines a doctrine regarding faith or morals to be held by the universal Church") *mean a pope is impeccable (or sinless / faultless) *extend to every decree issued by a pope *extend to everything a pope says *extend to every regulation issued by the Church *extend to merely pastoral matters *extend to a pope's actions *mean all popes are good *extend to all disciplinary measures, judgments, legal rulings, etc. *mean a pope is doctrinally perfect *mean that a pope can create new dogma *apply to a pope's private decisions or teachings *mean all pastoral decisions are good or prudent *extend to others who act in the pope's name *extend absolutely to a bishop or a council ("bishops may enjoy infallibility of teaching only in certain matters, and only when exercised in union with the pope") *apply when the pope is not intending to bind the entire Church *mean that popes will never contradict each other (they may never contradict only in infallible matters when each is speaking ex cathedra) *apply in areas that are not protected by infallibility (e.g. pastoral matters) *assure that a pope is holy *insure that a pope cannot err *transfer to others (although each succeeding pope will be invested with papal infallibility) *mean that a pope is infallible in all matters (disciplinary, etc.) *mean that a pope does not personally hold erroneous views (even in matters of faith or morals) * etc. It should also be noted that the pope very rarely speaks infallibly and that infallibility is limited to certain doctrinal matters. Merely pastoral matters - including certain liturgical decisions - are changeable [in contrast with doctrinal matters (which are unchangeable)] and are not subject to infallibility. Pastoral decisions of a pope may be erroneous, and may not be good for the Church. Infallibility may be exercised only under certain conditions and in connection with certain matters (i.e."when carrying out the office of pastor and teacher of all Christians, by virtue of his supreme apostolic authority he defines a doctrine regarding faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter"). Has Infallibility Ever Failed? No ex-cathedra definition of a pope has ever been found to be erroneous. Although it is said that more than 40 popes have preached doctrinal error, none were speaking "ex cathedra". In other words, some popes have personally taught error, but these errors were not taught in an infallible manner, binding the entire Church. These errors of popes were carefully examined by the First Vatican Council which defined the dogma of papal infallibility, and none of them were found to violate the dogma of infallibility. As indicated above, not everything said or believed or taught by a pope (or bishop/councils) is infallible. Some popes have held erroneous views, some have taught error (though not "ex cathedra"), and some have behaved scandalously. In fact, the history of the Church shows possible papal participation (or culpability) in: * wrongful excommunications *violations of treaties *imprudent decisions *poor administration *failure to condemn heresy *bad / scandalous decisions *siding with / defending heretics *scandals * etc. Additionally, popes may have: *approved of ambiguous creeds * buckled under persecution * engaged in secret arrangements * ordered homicides / torture * been guilty of simony & nepotism * reversed / contradicted actions of predecessors (or their own) * held erroneous views * etc. Popes have shown weakness, made inappropriate concessions, made decisions under pressure, etc. One pope was condemned as a heretic. Another exhumed a dead pope and put his body on trial. One approved a five year old as bishop. Some periods saw the papacy controlled by powerful families. Other periods suffered from multiple claimants to the throne. "When God gave to Blessed Peter the princely power of binding and loosing in heaven and on earth, He made no exception,and withdrew nothing from his power." --Pope Gregory VII, 1081 A.D. Despite all of this, however, papal infallibility - and Christ's promise - have never failed the Church. Even certain events in the history of the Church that are considered "close calls" for infallibility have still stopped short of breaching thisdoctrine. For example,the pope who was declared heretical never taught error "excathedra", the ambiguous creed signed by a pope couldbe taken in an orthodox manner, one pope died before approving a faulty translation of the Bible, and other popes who held doctrinal errors never taught them infallibility. In fact, it is a testament to Christ's promise andproof of the dogma of infallibility that despite faulty and sinful popes, the Church's doctrine has been preserved unsullied for about two thousand years. "Against an enemy so artful [as the devil] the infallible light of the Church is very necessary." --Fr. Delaporte "Oh yes; men are made infallible because Jesus is with and in them! In everything else they are men like ourselves; but the Chair on which they are throned is supported by the arm of God; it is the Chair of Truth upon the earth." --Dom Guéranger "The Roman See has never erred, and never will err, because of Christ's promise." --Pope St. Agatho, 680A.D. "Certainly this teaching authority of the Church, not by any merely human effort but under the protection of the Spiritof Truth, and therefore absolutely without error, carries out the commission entrusted to it, that ofpreserving the revealed truths pure and entire throughout every age, in such a way that it presents them undefiled, adding nothing to them and taking nothing away from them." --Pope Pius XII,"Munificentissimus Deus", 1950 "Furthermore, [St.] Augustine emphatically asserted that this unity of the universal Church and her absolute inerrancy as a teacher, is derived not only from her invisible Head, Christ Jesus, who from Heaven 'rules His body' and speaks by the lips of His teaching Church, but also for her visible head on earth, the Roman Pontiff, to whom the chair of Peter belongs by the lawful right of succession. For this line of Peter's successors 'is that rock against which the haughty gates of hell do not prevail'. By incontestable right we 'are kept within the bosom of the Church by a succession of priests from the chair of Peter the Apostle, to whom our Lord after His resurrection gave the charge of feeding His sheep, down to the episcopate of today'." --Pope Pius XI, "Ad Salutem", 1930 © Edited and compiled by the owner of www.archlegend.tk |CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY |

THE EUCHARIST

The Eucharist Signifies Three Things It must, therefore, be diligently explained what the Sacrament of the Eucharist signifies, that the faithful, beholding the sacred mysteries with their eyes, may also at the same time feed their souls with the contemplation of divine things. Three things, then, are signified by this Sacrament. The first is the Passion of Christ our Lord, a thing past;for He Himself said: "And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me. " (Luke 22:19). "Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. " (John 6:53-56). As often as you shall eat this bread, and drink the chalice, you shall show the death of the Lord, until he come. It is also significant of divine and heavenly grace, which is imparted at the present time by this Sacrament to nurture and preserve the soul.Just as in Baptism we are begotten unto newness of life and by Confirmation are strengthened to resist Satan and openly to profess the name of Christ, so by the Sacrament of the Eucharist are we nurtured and supported. It is, thirdly, a foreshadowing of future eternal joy and glory, which, according to God's promises, we shall receive in our heavenly country. These three things, then, which are clearly distinguished by their reference to past, present and future times, are so well represented by the Eucharistic mysteries that the whole Sacrament, though consisting of different species, signifies the three as if it referred to one thing only. Catechism of Council of Trent. Edited and compiled by the owner of www.archlegend.tk |CHARLES MARC-ANTHONY |

Why did Luther reject 7 books from the Bible?

Because they did not suit his new doctrines. He had arrived at the principle of private judgment - of picking and choosing religious doctrines; and whenever any book, such as the book of Machabees, taught a doctrine contrary to his taste he rejected it overboard and overboard that book went because it says: 2 Mach. xii 46, "it is a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead thatthey may be loosed from sins." He not onlycast out certain books, but he mutilated some that were left. For example, not pleased with St. Paul's doctrine, "we are justified by faith," Luther added the word "ALONE" to make the sentence read: "We are justifiedby faith alone." His explanationof this insertion is found in his own words, "I know very well that the word 'alone' is not in the Latin and Greek texts; but Dr. Martin Luther will have it so, and I order it to be so, and my will is reason enough. " St. Paul writes under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost. Luther creates a Lutheran Bible under his own audacity. He shows little respect forthe Bible when he calls the Epistle of St. James "an Epistle of straw with no character of the Gospel in it." He spoke disparagingly about the Epistle of St. Jude,the Epistle to the Hebrews, and the beautiful Apocalypse of St. John.The Lord's Prayer or the Our Father is in the Bible, but Catholic prayer differs from the Protestant. Protestants use a conclusion which was not in the original Greek copies of the New Testament, namely, "For thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory, forever. Amen." Catholics say the Lord's Prayer properly. Before the last book in the New Testament waswritten the Catholic Church celebrated her golden jubilee; 11 of the Apostles had died. Hence, THE BIBLE CAMEFROM THE CHURCH. THE CHURCH DID NOT COME FROM THE BIBLE. Christianity existed over 300 years without one single Bible Christian.

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Q: Why did Pope John XXIII convoke Vatican Council II? By Arch-Legend DE Marie Q: Why did Pope John XXIII convoke Vatican Council II? A: His intention in convoking Vatican Council II as the twenty-first worldwide council(a council of the bishops of the entire Church) was to renew the life of the Church, to reform structuresand institutions that needed updating, and to discover ways and means of promotingunity among all Christians. Pope John used the Italian word aggiornamento in stating his purpose for Vatican Council II. Its general meaning is "to bring up to date," "to renew,""to revitalize." The word is descriptive of the processes of spiritual renewal and institutional reform and change in the Church judged necessary by Vatican CouncilII. In his opening speech to the Ecumenical Council of Vatican II, Pope John said that the first need in calling the council was "toassert once again the Magisterium, which is unfailing andperdures untilthe end of time." The"magisterium" means the teaching authority of the Church.How unfortunate that, after this council, the magisterium, the teaching authority of the Church,was so often ignored even by some who said they spoke"in thespirit of Vatican II" or the "spirit of Pope John." In calling the council, Pope John noted that he looked to the past, to listen to its voice. He declared that it wasthe principalduty of the council to defend andto advance the truth. The councilwas to be loyal to the sacred patrimony of truth, asreceived from the fathers, but to see ever new avenues by which to take thesame, true faith of Christ to the world. He insisted that the Catholic Church would continue to oppose errors, but that its opposition must be treated with the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity. He sought ever greaterunity in sanctity, and great joy inthe eventual union of all the Christian churches of the world. Thus the reform and change thatPope John sought in calling the council was in no way to change the faith and morals of the Catholic Church.His idea was to develop no new doctrine but a new way to make the constant unchangeable faith in Christ — as given the apostles in the sacred deposit of faith — ever more effective in the lives of people and for the evangelization of theentire world.

Q: Why did Pope John XXIII convoke Vatican Council II? By Arch-Legend DE Marie Q: Why did Pope John XXIII convoke Vatican Council II? A: His intention in convoking Vatican Council II as the twenty-first worldwide council(a council of the bishops of the entire Church) was to renew the life of the Church, to reform structuresand institutions that needed updating, and to discover ways and means of promotingunity among all Christians. Pope John used the Italian word aggiornamento in stating his purpose for Vatican Council II. Its general meaning is "to bring up to date," "to renew,""to revitalize." The word is descriptive of the processes of spiritual renewal and institutional reform and change in the Church judged necessary by Vatican CouncilII. In his opening speech to the Ecumenical Council of Vatican II, Pope John said that the first need in calling the council was "toassert once again the Magisterium, which is unfailing andperdures untilthe end of time." The"magisterium" means the teaching authority of the Church.How unfortunate that, after this council, the magisterium, the teaching authority of the Church,was so often ignored even by some who said they spoke"in thespirit of Vatican II" or the "spirit of Pope John." In calling the council, Pope John noted that he looked to the past, to listen to its voice. He declared that it wasthe principalduty of the council to defend andto advance the truth. The councilwas to be loyal to the sacred patrimony of truth, asreceived from the fathers, but to see ever new avenues by which to take thesame, true faith of Christ to the world. He insisted that the Catholic Church would continue to oppose errors, but that its opposition must be treated with the medicine of mercy rather than that of severity. He sought ever greaterunity in sanctity, and great joy inthe eventual union of all the Christian churches of the world. Thus the reform and change thatPope John sought in calling the council was in no way to change the faith and morals of the Catholic Church.His idea was to develop no new doctrine but a new way to make the constant unchangeable faith in Christ — as given the apostles in the sacred deposit of faith — ever more effective in the lives of people and for the evangelization of theentire world.

THE TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC DISPOSITION: "Jesus Christ calls us all into His school to learn, not to work miracles nor to astonishthe world by marvelous enterprises, but to be humbleof heart. "Learn of Me, because I am meek and humble of heart." [Matt. 11, 29] He has not called everyone to be doctors, preachers or priests, nor has He bestowed on all the gift of restoring sight to the blind, healing the sick, raising the dead or casting out devils, but to all He has said: "Learn of Me to be humble of heart," and to all He has given the power to learn humility of Him. Innumerable things are worthy of imitation in the Incarnate Son of God, but He only asks us to imitate His humility. What then? Must we suppose that all the treasures of Divine Wisdom which were in Christ are to be reduced to the virtue of humility? "So it certainly is," answers St. Augustine. Humility contains all things because in this virtue is truth; therefore God must also dwell therein, since He isthe truth. The Savior might have said:"Learn of Me to be chaste, humble, prudent, just, wise, abstemious, etc." But He only says: "Learn of Me, because Iam meek and humble of heart"; and in humility alone He includes all things, because, as St. Thomas so truly says, "Acquired humilityis in a certain sense the greatest good." [Lib. de sancta virginit. c. xxxv] Therefore whoever possesses this virtue may be said, as to his proximate disposition, to possess all virtues, and he who lacks it, lacks all." --Fr. Cajetan Mary da Bergamo

Saturday, 17 November 2012

VIRGIN MARY MOTHER OF GOD

Martin Luther, Founder of the Reform,
Speaks on Mary
In his sermon of
August 15, 1522,
the last time Martin Luther preached on the Feast of the Assumption, he stated:
There can be no doubt that the Virgin Mary is in heaven.
How it happened we do not know.
And since the Holy Spirit has told us nothing about it,
we can make of it no article of faith . . .
It is enough to know that she lives in Christ.
The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of thehuman heart.
(Sermon, September 1, 1522).
•••
[She is the] highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ . . .
She is nobility, wisdom,
and holiness personified.
We can never honor her enough.
Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.
(Sermon, Christmas, 1531).
•••
No woman is like you.
You are more than Eve or Sarah,
blessed above all nobility, wisdom,and sanctity. (Sermon, Feast of theVisitation, 1537).
•••
One should honor Mary as she herself wished and as she expressed it in the Magnificat.
She praised God for his deeds.
How then can we praise her?
The true honor of Mary is the honor of God,
the praise of God's grace . . .
Mary is nothing for the sake of herself,
but for the sake of Christ . . .
Mary does not wish that we come to her,
but through her to God. (Explanation of the Magnificat, 1521).
•••
Luther gives the Blessed Virgin the exalted position of "Spiritual Mother"
for Christians:
It is the consolation and the superabundant goodness of God,
that man is able to exult in such a treasure.
Mary is his true Mother .. (Sermon, Christmas, 1522)
•••
Mary is the Mother of Jesus and the Mother of all of us even though it was Christ alone who reposed on her knees . . .
If he is ours,
we ought to be in his situation; there where he is,
we ought also to be and all that he has ought to be ours, and his mother is also our mother.
(Sermon, Christmas, 1529).
•••
Martin Luther had the belief of Mary's Immaculate Conception,
Luther's words follow:
It is a sweet and pious belief that the infusion of Mary's soul was effected without original sin;
so that in the very infusion of her soul she was also purified from original sin and adorned with God's gifts,
receiving a pure soul infused by God;
thus from the first moment she began to live she was free from allsin"
(Sermon: "On the Day of the Conception of the Mother of God," 1527).
•••
She is full of grace,
proclaimed to be entirely without sin- something exceedingly great.
For God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil.
(Personal {"Little"} Prayer Book, 1522).
•••
Martin Luther on Mary's Perpetual Virginity
Here are some of the founders of refom commenting on Mary:
Christ, our Savior,
was the real and natural fruit of Mary's virginal womb . . .
This was without the cooperationof a man,
and she remained a virgin after that.
{Luther's Works, eds. Jaroslav Pelikan (vols. 1-30) & Helmut T. Lehmann (vols. 31-55), St. Louis: Concordia Pub. House (vols. 1-30); Philadelphia: Fortress Press (vols. 31-55), 1955, v.22:23 / Sermons on John, chaps. 1-4 (1539) }
•••
Christ . . . was the only Son of Mary,
and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him . . .
I am inclined to agree with those who declare that 'brothers' really mean 'cousins' here,
for Holy Writ and the Jews always call cousins brothers.
{Pelikan, ibid., v.22:214-15 / Sermons on John, chaps. 1-4 (1539) }
•••
A new lie about me is being circulated.
I am supposed to have preached and written that Mary, the mother of God,
was not a virgin either before or after the birth of Christ . . .
{Pelikan, ibid.,v.45:199 / That Jesus Christ was Born a Jew (1523) }
•••
Scripture does not say or indicate that she later lost her virginity . . .
When Matthew [1:25]
says that Joseph did not know Mary carnally until she had brought forth her son,
it does not follow that he knew her subsequently;
on the contrary,
it means that he never did know her . . .
This babble . . .
is without justification . . .
he has neither noticed nor paid any attention to either Scripture or the common idiom.
{Pelikan, ibid.,v.45:206, 212-3 / That Jesus Christ was Born a Jew (1523) }
•••
Editor Jaroslav Pelikan (Lutheran) adds:
Luther . . . does not even consider the possibility that Mary might have had other children than Jesus.
This is consistent with his lifelong acceptance of the idea of the perpetual virginity of Mary.
{Pelikan, ibid.,v.22:214- 5}
•••
". . . she is full of grace, proclaimedto be entirely without sin. . . .
God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil. . . .
God is with her,
meaning that all she did or left undone is divine and the action ofGod in her.
Moreover, God guarded and protected her from all that might be hurtful to her."
Ref: Luther's Works, American edition, vol. 43, p. 40, ed. H. Lehmann, Fortress, 1968
•••
". . . she is rightly called not only the mother of the man, but also the Mother of God. . . .
{In Hilda Graef, Mary: A history of Doctrine and Devotion, combined ed. of vols. 1 & 2, London: Sheed &Ward, 1965, vol.2, pp.14-5}
•••
John Wesley
(Founder of Methodism)
The Blessed Virgin Mary, who, as well after as when she brought him forth,
continued a pure and unspotted virgin.
{"Letter to a Roman Catholic" / In This Rock, Nov. 1990, p.25}
•••
Lord Jesus,
let Your prayer of unity for Christians become a reality,
in Your way.
We have absolute confidence
that you can bring your people together,
we give you absolute permission to move.
Amen

101 Contradictions In The Bible


1.Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
(a) God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
(b) Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
2.In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
(a) Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
(b) One million, one hundred thousand (IChronicles 21:5)
3. How many fighting men were found in Judah?
(a) Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
(b) Four hundred and seventy thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
4.God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine?
(a) Seven (2 Samuel 24:13)
(b) Three (I Chronicles 21:12)
5.How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem?
(a) Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26)
(b) Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)
6.How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
(a) Eighteen (2 Kings 24:8)
(b) Eight (2 Chronicles 36:9)
7.How long did he rule over Jerusalem?
(a) Three months (2 Kings 24:8)
(b) Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9)
8.The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men at one time?
(a) Eight hundred (2 Samuel 23:8)
(b) Three hundred (I Chronicles 11: 11)
9.When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
(a) After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
(b) Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
10.How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to take into the Ark?
(a) Two (Genesis 6:19, 20)
(b) Seven (Genesis 7:2). But despite this last instruction only two pairs went into the ark (Genesis 7:8-9)
11.When David defeated the King of Zobah, how many horsemen did he capture?
(a) One thousand and seven hundred (2 Samuel 8:4)
(b) Seven thousand (I Chronicles 18:4)
12.How many stalls for horses did Solomon have?
(a) Forty thousand (I Kings 4:26)
(b) Four thousand (2 chronicles 9:25)
13.In what year of King Asa's reign did Baasha, King of Israel die?
(a) Twenty-sixth year (I Kings 15:33 - 16:8)
(b) Still alive in the thirty-sixth year (2 Chronicles 16:1)
14.How many overseers did Solomon appoint for the work of building the temple?
(a) Three thousand six hundred (2 Chronicles 2:2)
(b) Three thousand three hundred (I Kings 5:16)
15.Solomon built a facility containing how many baths?
(a) Two thousand (1 Kings 7:26)
(b) Over three thousand (2 Chronicles 4:5)
16.Of the Israelites who were freed from the Babylonian captivity, how many were the children of
Pahrath-Moab?
(a) Two thousand eight hundred and twelve (Ezra 2:6)
(b) Two thousand eight hundred and eighteen (Nehemiah 7:11)
17.How many were the children of Zattu?
(a) Nine hundred and forty-five (Ezra 2:8)
(b) Eight hundred and forty-five (Nehemiah 7:13)
18.How many were the children of Azgad?
(a) One thousand two hundred and twenty-two (Ezra 2:12)
(b) Two thousand three hundred and twenty-two (Nehemiah 7:17)
19.How many were the children of Adin?
(a) Four hundred and fifty-four (Ezra 2:15)
(b) Six hundred and fifty-five (Nehemiah 7:20)
20.How many were the children of Hashum?
(a) Two hundred and twenty-three (Ezra 2:19)
(b) Three hundred and twenty-eight (Nehemiah 7:22)
21.How many were the children of Bethel and Ai?
(a) Two hundred and twenty-three (Ezra 2:28)
(b) One hundred and twenty-three (Nehemiah 7:32)
22.Ezra 2:64 and Nehemiah 7:66 agree that the total number of the whole assembly was 42,360. Yet the
numbers do not add up to anything close. The totals obtained from each book is as follows:
(a) 29,818 (Ezra)
(b) 31,089 (Nehemiah)
23.How many singers accompanied the assembly?
(a) Two hundred (Ezra 2:65)
(b) Two hundred and forty-five (Nehemiah 7:67)
24.What was the name of King Abijah’s mother?
(a) Michaiah, daughter of Uriel of Gibeah (2 Chronicles 13:2)
(b) Maachah, daughter of Absalom (2 Chronicles 11:20) But Absalom had only one daughter whose name
was Tamar (2 Samuel 14:27)
25.Did Joshua and the Israelites capture Jerusalem?
(a) Yes (Joshua 10:23, 40)
(b) No (Joshua 15:63)
26.Who was the father of Joseph, husband of Mary?
(a) Jacob (Matthew 1:16)
(b) Hell (Luke 3:23)
27.Jesus descended from which son of David?
(a) Solomon (Matthew 1:6)
(b) Nathan (Luke3: 31)
28.Who was the father of Shealtiel?
(a) Jechoniah (Matthew 1:12)
(b) Neri’ (Luke 3:27)
29.Which son of Zerubbabel was an ancestor of Jesus Christ?
(a) Abiud (Matthew 1: 13)
(b) Rhesa (Luke 3:27) but the seven sons of Zerubbabel are as follows: i. Meshullam, ii. Hananiah, iii.
Hashubah, iv. Ohel, v. Berechiah, vi. Hasadiah, viii. Jushabhesed (I Chronicles 3:19, 20). The names
Abiud and Rhesa do not fit in anyway.
30.Who was the father of Uzziah?
(a) Joram (Matthew 1:8)
(b) Amaziah (2 Chronicles 26:1)
31.Who as the father of Jechoniah?
(a) Josiah (Matthew 1:11)
(b) Jeholakim (I Chronicles 3:16)
32.How many generations were there from the Babylonian exile until Christ?
(a) Matthew says fourteen (Matthew 1:17)
(b) But a careful count of the generations reveals only thirteen (see Matthew 1: 12-16)
33.Who was the father of Shelah?
(a) Cainan (Luke 3:35-36)
(b) Arphaxad (Genesis II: 12)
34.Was John the Baptist Elijah who was to come?
(a) Yes (Matthew II: 14, 17:10-13)
(b) No (John 1:19-21)
35.Would Jesus inherit David’s throne?
(a) Yes. So said the angel (Luke 1:32)
(b) No, since he is a descendant of Jehoiakim (see Matthew 1: I 1, I Chronicles 3:16). And Jehoiakim was
cursed by God so that none of his descendants can sit upon David’s throne (Jeremiah 36:30)
36.Jesus rode into Jerusalem on how many animals?
(a) One - a colt (Mark 11:7; cf Luke 19:3 5). “And they brought the colt to Jesus and threw their
garments on it; and he sat upon it.”
(b) Two - a colt and an ass (Matthew 21:7). “They brought the ass and the colt and put their garments
on them and he sat thereon.”
37.How did Simon Peter find out that Jesus was the Christ?
(a) By a revelation from heaven (Matthew 16:17)
(b) His brother Andrew told him (John 1:41)
38.Where did Jesus first meet Simon Peter and Andrew?
(a) By the Sea of Galilee (Matthew 4:18-22)
(b) On the banks of river Jordan (John 1:42). After that, Jesus decided to go to Galilee (John 1:43)
39.When Jesus met Jairus was Jairus’ daughter already dead?
(a) Yes. Matthew 9:18 quotes him as saying, “My daughter has just died.”
(b) No. Mark 5:23 quotes him as saying, “My little daughter is at the point of death.”
40.Did Jesus allow his disciples to keep a staff on their journey?
(a) Yes (Mark6: 8)
(b) No (Matthew 10:9; Luke 9:3)
41.Did Herod think that Jesus was John the Baptist?
(a) Yes (Matthew 14:2; Mark 6:16)
(b) No (Luke 9:9)
42.Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus before his baptism?
(a) Yes (Matthew 3:13-14)
(b) No (John 1:32,33)
43.Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus after his baptism?
(a) Yes (John 1:32, 33)
(b) No (Matthew 11:2)
44.According to the Gospel of John, what did Jesus say about bearing his own witness?
(a) “If I bear witness to myself, my testimony is not true” (John 5:3 1)
(b) “Even if I do bear witness to myself, my testimony is true” (John 8:14)
45.When Jesus entered Jerusalem did he cleanse the temple that same day?
(a) Yes (Matthew 21:12)
(b) No. He went into the temple and looked around, but since it was very late he did nothing. Instead, he
went to Bethany to spend the night and returned the next morning to cleanse the temple (Mark I 1:1-
17).
46.The Gospels say that Jesus cursed a fig tree. Did the tree wither at once?
(a) Yes. (Matthew 21:19)
(b) No. It withered overnight (Mark II: 20)
47.Did Judas kiss Jesus?
(a) Yes (Matthew 26:48-50)
(b) No. Judas could not get close enough to Jesus to kiss him (John 18:3-12)
48.What did Jesus say about Peter’s denial?
(a) “The cock will not crow till you have denied me three times” (John 13:38).
(b) “Before the cock crows twice you will deny me three times” (Mark 14:30). When the cock crowed
once, the three denials were not yet complete (see Mark 14:72). Therefore prediction (a) failed.
49.Did Jesus bear his own cross?
(a) Yes (John 19:17)
(b) No (Matthew 27:31-32)
50.Did Jesus die before the curtain of the temple was torn?
(a) Yes (Matthew27: 50-5 1;MarklS: 37-38)
(b) No. After the curtain was torn, then Jesus crying with a loud voice, said, “Father, into thy hands I
commit my spirit!” And having said this he breathed his last (Luke 23:45-46)
51.Did Jesus say anything secretly?
(a) No. “I have said nothing secretly” (John 18:20)
(b) Yes. “He did not speak to them without a parable, but privately to his own disciples he explained
everything” (Mark 4:34). The disciples asked him “Why do you speak to them in parables?” He said, “To
you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given”
(Matthew 13: 1 0-11)
52.Where was Jesus at the sixth hour on the day of the crucifixion?
(a) On the cross (Mark 15:23)
(b) In Pilate’s court (John 19:14)
53.The gospels say that two thieves were crucified along with Jesus. Did both thieves mock Jesus?
(a) Yes (Mark 15:32)
(b) No. One of them mocked Jesus, the other defended Jesus (Luke 23:43)
54.Did Jesus ascend to Paradise the same day of the crucifixion?
(a) Yes. He said to the thief who defended him, “Today you will be with me in Paradise” (Luke 23:43)
(b) No. He said to Mary Magdelene two days later, “I have not yet ascended to the Father” (John 20:17)
55.When Paul was on the road to Damascus he saw a light and heard a voice. Did those who were with
him hear the voice?
(a) Yes (Acts9: 7)
(b) No (Acts22: 9)
56.When Paul saw the light he fell to the ground. Did his traveling companions also fall to the ground?
(a) Yes (Acts 26:14)
(b) No (Acts 9:7)
57.Did the voice spell out on the spot what Paul’s duties were to be?
(a) Yes (Acts 26:16-18)
(b) No. The voice commanded Paul to go into the city of Damascus and there he will be told what he
must do. (Acts9: 7; 22: 10)
58.When the Israelites dwelt in Shittin they committed adultery with the daughters of Moab. God struck
them with a plague. How many people died in that plague?
(a) Twenty-four thousand (Numbers 25:1 and 9)
(b) Twenty-three thousand (I Corinthians 10:8)
59.How many members of the house of Jacob came to Egypt?
(a) Seventy souls (Genesis 4&27)
(b) Seventy-five souls (Acts 7:14)
60.What did Judas do with the blood money he received for betraying Jesus?
(a) He bought a field (Acts 1: 18)
(b) He threw all of it into the temple and went away. The priests could not put the blood money into the
temple treasury, so they used it to buy a field to bury strangers (Matthew 27:5)
61.How did Judas die?
(a) After he threw the money into the temple he went away and hanged himself (Matthew 27:5)
(b) After he bought the field with the price of his evil deed he fell headlong and burst open in the middle
and all his bowels gushed out (Acts 1:18)
62.Why is the field called “Field of Blood”?
(a) Because the priests bought it with the blood money (Matthew 27:8)
(b) Because of the bloody death of Judas therein (Acts 1:19)
63.Who is a ransom for whom?
(a) “The Son of Man came...to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). “Christ Jesus who gave
himself as a ransom for all... “(I Timothy 2:5-6)
(b) “The wicked is a ransom for the righteous, and the faithless for the upright” (Proverbs 21:18)
64.Is the Law of Moses useful?
(a) Yes. “All scripture is... profitable...” (2 Timothy 3:16)
(b) No. “ . . . A former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness... “(Hebrews
7:18)
65.What was the exact wording on the cross?
(a) “This is Jesus the King of the Jews” (Matthew 27:37)
(b) “The King of the Jews” (Mark 15:26)
(c) “This is the King of the Jews” (Luke 23:38)
(d) “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews” (John 19:19)
66.Did Herod want to kill John the Baptist?
(a) Yes (Matthew 14:5)
(b) No. It was Herodias, the wife of Herod who wanted to kill him. But Herod knew that he was a
righteous man and kept him safe (Mark 6:20)
67.Who was the tenth disciple of Jesus in the list of twelve?
(a) Thaddaeus (Matthew 10: 1-4; Mark 3:13 -19)
(b) Judas son of James is the corresponding name in Luke’s gospel (Luke 6:12-16)
68.Jesus saw a man sit at the tax collector’s office and called him to be his disciple. What was his name?
(a) Matthew (Matthew 9:9)
(b) Levi (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27)
69.Was Jesus crucified on the daytime before the Passover meal or the daytime after?
(a) After (Mark 14:12-17)
(b) Before. Before the feast of the Passover (John 1) Judas went out at night (John 13:30). The other
disciples thought he was going out to buy supplies to prepare for the Passover meal (John 13:29). When
Jesus was arrested, the Jews did not enter Pilate’s judgment hail because they wanted to stay clean to
eat the Passover (John 18:28). When the judgment was pronounced against Jesus, it was about the sixth
hour on the day of Preparation for the Passover (John 19:14)
70.Did Jesus pray to The Father to prevent the crucifixion?
(a) Yes. (Matthew 26:39; Mark 14:36; Luke 22:42)
(b) No. (John 12:27)
71.In the gospels which say that Jesus prayed to avoid the cross, how many times did ‘he move away
from his disciples to pray?
(a) Three (Matthew 26:36-46 and Mark 14:32-42)
(b) One. No opening is left for another two times. (Luke 22:39-46)
72.Matthew and Mark agree that Jesus went away and prayed three times. What were the words of the
second prayer?
(a) Mark does not give the words but he says that the words were the same as the first prayer (Mark
14:3 9)
(b) Matthew gives us the words, and we can see that they are not the same as in the first (Matthew
26:42)
73.What did the centurion say when Jesus dies?
(a) “Certainly this man was innocent” (Luke 23:47)
(b) “Truly this man was the Son of God” (Mark 15:39)
74.When Jesus said “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken Me? ” in what language did he speak?
(a) Hebrew: the words are “Eloi, Eloi…“(Matthew 27:46)
(b) Aramaic: the words are “Eloi, Eloi... “(Mark 15:34)
75.According to the gospels, what were the last words of Jesus before he died?
(a) “Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit!” (Luke 23:46)
(b) "It is finished" (John 19:30).
76.When Jesus entered Capernaum he healed the slave of a centurion. Did the centurion come personally
to request Jesus for this?
(a) Yes (Matthew 8:5)
(b) No. He sent some elders of the Jews and his friends (Luke 7:3,6)
77. (a) Adam was told that if and when he eats the forbidden fruit he would die the same day (Genesis
2:17)
(b) Adam ate the fruit and went on to live to a ripe old age of 930 years (Genesis 5:5)
78. (a) God decided that the life span of humans will be limited to 120 years (Genesis 6:3)
(b) Many people born after that lived longer than 120. Arpachshad lived 438 years. His son Shelah lived
433 years. His son Eber lived 464 years, etc. (Genesis 11:12-16)
79.Apart from Jesus did anyone else ascend to heaven?
(a) No (John 3:13)
(b) Yes. “And Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven” (2 Kings 2:11)
80.Who was high priest when David went into the house of God and ate the consecrated bread?
(a) Abiathar (Mark 2:26)
(b) Ahimelech, the father of Abiathar (I Samuel 1:1; 22:20)
81.Was Jesus’ body wrapped in spices before burial in accordance with Jewish burial customs?
(a) Yes and his female disciples witnessed his burial (John 19:39-40)
(b) No. Jesus was simply wrapped in a linen shroud. Then the women bought and prepared spices “so
that they may go and anoint him [Jesus)” (Mark 16: 1)
82.When did the women buy the spices?
(a) After “the Sabbath was past” (Mark 16:1)
(b) Before the Sabbath. The women “prepared spices and ointments.” Then, “on the Sabbath they rested
according to the commandment” (Luke 23:55 to 24:1)
83.At what time of day did the women visit the tomb?
(a) “Toward the dawn” (Matthew 28: 1)
(b) “When the sun had risen” (Mark 16:2)
84.What was the purpose for which the women went to the tomb?
(a) To anoint Jesus’ body with spices (Mark 16: 1; Luke 23:55 to 24: 1)
(b) To see the tomb. Nothing about spices here (Matthew 28: 1)
(c) For no specified reason. In this gospel the wrapping with spices had been done before the Sabbath
(John 20: 1)
85.A large stone was placed at the entrance of the tomb. Where was the stone when the women arrived?
(a) They saw that the stone was “Rolled back” (Mark 16:4) They found the stone “rolled away from the
tomb” (Luke 24:2) They saw that “the stone had been taken away from the tomb” (John 20:1)
(b) As the women approached, an angel descended from heaven, rolled away the stone, and conversed
with the women. Matthew made the women witness the spectacular rolling away of the stone (Matthew
28:1-6)
86.Did anyone tell the women what happened to Jesus’ body?
(a) Yes. “A young man in a white robe” (Mark 16:5). “Two men ... in dazzling apparel” later described as
angels (Luke 24:4 and 24:23). An angel - the one who rolled back the stone (Matthew 16:2). In each
case the women were told that Jesus had risen from the dead (Matthew 28:7; Mark 16:6; Luke 24:5
footnote)
(b) No. Mary met no one and returned saying, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not
know where they have laid him” (John 20:2)
87.When did Mary Magdelene first meet the resurrected Jesus? And how did she react?
(a) Mary and the other women met Jesus on their way back from their first and only visit to the tomb.
They took hold of his feet and worshipped him (Matthew 28:9)
(b) On her second visit to the tomb Mary met Jesus just outside the tomb. When she saw Jesus she did
not recognize him. She mistook him for the gardener. She still thinks that Jesus’ body is laid to rest
somewhere and she demands to know where. But when Jesus said her name she at once recognized him
and called him “Teacher.” Jesus said to her, “Do not hold me...” (John 20:11 to 17)
88.What was Jesus’ instruction for his disciples?
(a) “Tell my brethren to go to Galilee, and there they will see me” (Matthew 2 8: 10)
(b) “Go to my brethren and say to them, I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and
your God” (John 20:17)
89.When did the disciples return to Galilee?
(a) Immediately, because when they saw Jesus in Galilee “some doubted” (Matthew 28:17). This period
of uncertainty should not persist
(b) After at least 40 days. That evening the disciples were still in Jerusalem (Luke 24:3 3). Jesus
appeared to them there and told them, stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high”
(Luke 24:49). He was appearing to them “during forty days” (Acts 1:3), and “charged them not to depart
from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise ... “(Acts 1:4)
90.To whom did the Midianites sell Joseph?
(a) “To the Ishmaelites” (Genesis 37:28)
(b) “To Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh” (Genesis 37:36)
91.Who brought Joseph to Egypt?
(a) The Ishmaelites bought Joseph and then “took Joseph to Egypt” (Genesis 37:28)
(b) “The Midianites had sold him in Egypt” (Genesis 37:36)
(c) Joseph said to his brothers “I am your brother, Joseph, whom you sold into Egypt” (Genesis 45:4)
92.Does God change his mind?
(a) Yes. “The word of the Lord came to Samuel: “I repent that I have made Saul King...” (I Samuel 15:10
to 11)
(b) No. God “will not lie or repent; for he is not a man, that he should repent” (I Samuel 15:29)
(c) Yes. “And the Lord repented that he had made Saul King over Israel” (I Samuel 15:35). Notice that
the above three quotes are all from the same chapter of the same book! In addition, the Bible shows that
God repented on several other occasions:
i. “The Lord was sorry that he made man” (Genesis 6:6)
“I am sorry that I have made them” (Genesis 6:7)
ii. “And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do to his people” (Exodus 32:14).
iii. (Lots of other such references).
93.The Bible says that for each miracle Moses and Aaron demonstrated the magicians did the same by
their secret arts. Then comes the following feat:
(a) Moses and Aaron converted all the available water into blood (Exodus 7:20-21)
(b) The magicians did the same (Exodus 7:22). This is impossible, since there would have been no water
left to convert into blood.
94.Who killed Goliath?
(a) David (I Samuel 17:23, 50)
(b) Elhanan (2 Samuel 21:19)
95.Who killed Saul?
(a) “Saul took his own sword and fell upon it.... Thus Saul died... (I Samuel 31:4-6)
(b) An Amalekite slew him (2 Samuel 1:1- 16)
96.Does every man sin?
(a) Yes. “There is no man who does not sin” (I Kings 8:46; see also 2 Chronicles 6:36; Proverbs 20:9;
Ecclesiastes 7:20; and I John 1:810)
(b) No. True Christians cannot possibly sin, because they are the children of God. “Every one who
believes that Jesus is the Christ is a child of God. (I John 5:1). “We should be called children of God; and
so we are” (I John 3: 1). “He who loves is born of God” (I John 4:7). “No one born of God commits sin;
for God’s nature abides in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God” (I John 3:9). But, then
again, Yes! “If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (I John 1:8)
97.Who will bear whose burden?
(a) “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2)
(b) “Each man will have to bear his own load” (Galatians 6:5)
98.How many disciples did Jesus appear to after his resurrection?
(a) Twelve (I Corinthians 15:5)
(b) Eleven (Matthew 27:3-5 and Acts 1:9-26, see also Matthew 28:16; Mark 16:14 footnote; Luke 24:9;
Luke 24:3 3)
99.Where was Jesus three days after his baptism?
(a) After his baptism, “the spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness. And he was in the
wilderness forty days ... (Mark 1:12-13)
(b) Next day after the baptism, Jesus selected two disciples. Second day: Jesus went to Galilee - two
more disciples. Third day: Jesus was at a wedding feast in Cana in Galilee (see John 1:35; 1:43; 2:1-11)
100.Was baby Jesus’ life threatened in Jerusalem?
(a) Yes, so Joseph fled with him to Egypt and stayed there until Herod died (Matthew 2:13 23)
(b) No. The family fled nowhere. They calmly presented the child at the Jerusalem temple according to
the Jewish customs and returned to Galilee (Luke 2:21-40)
101.When Jesus walked on water how did the disciples respond?
(a) They worshipped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God” (Matthew 14:33)
(b) “They were utterly astounded, for they did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were
hardened” (Mark 6:51-52)https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=13aa30c22faadfe9&mt=application/pdf&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D4808a678bb%26view%3Datt%26th%3D13aa30c22faadfe9%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dsafe%26realattid%3Dfile0%26zw&sig=AHIEtbTiFV7e1seTz_d2YzU0c0RwjfX5qg

INFALLIBLE AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH.


The Church has authority from God to teach regarding faith and morals,
and in her teaching she is preserved from error by the special guidance of the Holy Ghost.
The prerogative of infallibility is clearly deduced from the attributes of the Church already mentioned.
The Church is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic.
Preaching the same creed everywhere and at all times; teaching holiness and truth, she is, of course,
essentially unerring in her doctrine;
for what is one,
holy or unchangeable must be infallibly true.
That the Church was infallible in the Apostolic age is denied by no Christian.
We never question the truth of the Apostles’ declarations;
they were, in fact,
the only authority in the Church for the first century.
The New Testament was not completed till the close of the first century.
There is no just ground for denying to the Apostolic teachers of the nineteenth century in which we live a prerogative clearlypossessed by those of the first,
especially as the Divine Word nowhere intimates that this unerring guidance was to die with the Apostles.
On the contrary,
as the Apostles transmitted to their successors their power to preach, to baptize, to ordain, to confirm, etc.,
they must also have handed downto them the no less essential gift of infallibility.
God loves us as much as He loved the primitive Christians;
Christ died for us as well as for them and we have as much need of unerring teachers as they had.
It will not suffice to tell me: “We have an infallible Scripture as a substitute for an infallible apostolate of the first century,”
for an infallible book is of no use to me without an infallible interpreter,
as the history of Protestantism too clearly demonstrates.
But besides these presumptive arguments,
we have positive evidence from Scripture that the Church cannot err in her teachings.
Our blessed Lord,
in constituting St. Peter Prince of His Apostles,
says to him:
“Thou art Peter,
and upon this rock I will build My Church,
and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
Christ makes here a solemn prediction that no error shall ever invade His Church,
and if she fell into error the gates of hell have certainly prevailed against her.
The Reformers of the sixteenth century affirm that the Church did fall into error;
that the gates of hell did prevail against her;
that from the sixth to the sixteenth century she was a sink of iniquity.
The Book of Homilies of the Church of England says that the Church
“lay buried in damnable idolatry for eight hundred years or more.”
The personal veracity of our Savior and of the Reformers is here at issue,
for our Lord makes a statement which they contradict.
Who is to be believed,
Jesus or the Reformers?
If the prediction of our Savior about the preservation of His Church from error be false,
then Jesus Christ is not God, since God cannot lie.
He is not even a prophet,
since He predicted falsehood.
Nay, He is an impostor,
and all Christianity is a miserable failure and a huge deception,
since it rests on a false Prophet.
But if Jesus predicted the truth when He declared that the gates of hell should not prevail against His Church
—and who dare deny it?
—then the Church never has and never could have fallen from the truth;
then the Catholic Church is infallible,
for she alone claims that prerogative,
and she is the only Church that is acknowledged to have existed from the beginning.
Truly is Jesus that wise Architect mentioned in the Gospel,
“who built his house upon a rock;
and the rain fell,
and the floods came,
and the winds blew,
and they beat upon that house, and it fell not,
for it was founded upon a rock.”
Jesus sends forth the Apostles with plenipotentiary powers to preach the Gospel.
“As the Father,”
He says,
“hath sent Me,
I also send you.”
“Going therefore,
teach all nations,
teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.”
“Preach the Gospel to every creature.”
“Ye shall be witnesses unto Me in Jerusalem,
and in all Judea,
and Samaria,
and even to the uttermost part of the earth.”
This commission evidently applies not to the Apostles only,
but also to their successors,
to the end of time,
since it was utterly impossible for the Apostles personally to preach to the whole world.
Not only does our Lord empower His Apostles to preach the Gospel,
but He commands,
and under the most severe penalties,
those to whom they preach to listen and obey.
“Whosoever will not receive you,
nor hear your words,
going forth from that house or city,
shake the dust from your feet.
Amen, I say to you,
it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment than for that city.”
“If he will not hear the Church, let him be to thee as the heathen andthe publican.”
“He that believeth shall be saved;
he that believeth not shall be condemned.”
“He that heareth you heareth Me;
he that despiseth you despiseth Me;
and he that despiseth Me despiseth Him that sent Me.”

in fact, that the definition was a mistake, and that the blunder of 1854 would be repaired in 1869.” I told him, of..

night,
that he is steering his course directly to the city of his destination;
and is not an infallible guide as necessary to conduct you to the city of God in heaven?
Is it not, moreover,
a blessing and a consolation that,
amid the ever-changing views of men,
amid the conflict of human opinion and the tumultuous waves of human passion,
there is one voice heard above the din and uproar,
crying in clear,
unerring tones:
“Thus saith the Lord?”
It is very strange that the Catholic Church must apologize to the world for simply declaring
that she speaks the truth,
the whole truth,
and nothing but the truth.
The Roman Pantheon was dedicated to all the gods of the Empire,
and their name was legion.
Formidable also in numbers are the Founders of the religious sects existing in our country.
A Pantheon as vast as Westminster Abbey would hardly be spacious enough to contain life-sized statues for their accommodation.
If you were to confront those figures,
and to ask them,
one by one,
to give an account of the faith they had professed,
and if they were endowed with the gift of speech,
you would find that no two of them were in entire accord,
but that they all differed among themselves on some fundamental principle of revelation.
Would you not be acting very unwisely and be hazarding your soul’s salvation
in submitting to the teachings of so many discordant and conflicting oracles.
Children of the Catholic Church,
give thanks to God that you are members of that Communion,
which proclaims year after year the one same and unalterable message of truth,
peace and love,
and that you are preserved from all errors in faith,
and from all illusion in the practiceof virtue.
You are happily strangers to thoseinterior conflicts,
to those perplexing doubts and tothat frightful uncertainty which distracts the souls
of those whose private judgment is their only guide,
who are
“ever learning and never attainingto the knowledge of the truth.”
You are not, like others,
drifting helplessly over the ocean of uncertainty and “carried about by every wind of doctrine.”
You are not as “blind men led by blind guides.”
You are not like those who are in the midst of a spiritual desert intersected by various by-paths,
not knowing which to pursue;
but you are on that high road spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, which is so
"straight a way that fools shall noterr therein.”
You are a part of that universal Communion which has no “High Church” and “Low Church;” no
“New School” and
“Old School,”
for you all belong to that School which is
“ever ancient and ever new.”
You enjoy that profound peace and tranquillity which springs from the conscious possession of the whole truth.
Well may you exclaim:
“Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwelltogether in unity.”
Give thanks, moreover,
to God that you belong to a Church which has also a keen sense to detect and expose those moral shams,
those pious frauds,
those socialistic schemes which are so often undertaken in this country ostensibly in the name of religion and morality, but which, in reality,
are subversive of morality and order,
which are the offspring of fanaticism,
and serve as a mask to hide the most debasing passions.
Neither Mormons nor Millerites,
nor the advocates of free love or of women’s rights,
so called,
find any recruits in the Catholic Church.
She will never suffer her children to be ensnared by these impostures,
how specious soever they may be.
From what has been said in the preceding pages,
it follows that the Catholic Church cannot be reformed.
I do not mean, of course,
that the Pastors of the Church are personally impeccable or not subject to sin.
Every teacher in the Church, from the Pope down to the humblest Priest,
is liable at any moment,
like any of the faithful,
to fall from grace and to stand in need of moral reformation.
We all carry
“this treasure
(of innocence)
in earthen vessels.”
My meaning is that the Church is not susceptible of being reformedin her doctrines.
The Church is the work of an Incarnate God.
Like all God’s works,
it is perfect.
It is, therefore,
incapable of reform.
Is it not the height of presumption for men to attempt to improve upon the work of God?
Is it not ridiculous for the Luthers,the Calvins,
the Knoxes and the Henries and a thousand lesser lights
to be offering their amendments to the Constitution of the Church,
as if it were a human Institution?
Our Lord Himself has never ceasedto rule personally over His Church.
It is time enough for little men to take charge of the Ship when the great Captain abandons the helm.
A Protestant gentleman of very liberal education remarked to me,
before the opening of the late Ecumenical Council:
“I am assured, sir, by a friend, in confidence, that,
at a secret Conclave of Bishops recently held in Rome
it was resolved that the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception wouldbe reconsidered and abolished at the approaching General Council;