Saturday, 17 November 2012

VIRGIN MARY MOTHER OF GOD

Martin Luther, Founder of the Reform,
Speaks on Mary
In his sermon of
August 15, 1522,
the last time Martin Luther preached on the Feast of the Assumption, he stated:
There can be no doubt that the Virgin Mary is in heaven.
How it happened we do not know.
And since the Holy Spirit has told us nothing about it,
we can make of it no article of faith . . .
It is enough to know that she lives in Christ.
The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of thehuman heart.
(Sermon, September 1, 1522).
•••
[She is the] highest woman and the noblest gem in Christianity after Christ . . .
She is nobility, wisdom,
and holiness personified.
We can never honor her enough.
Still honor and praise must be given to her in such a way as to injure neither Christ nor the Scriptures.
(Sermon, Christmas, 1531).
•••
No woman is like you.
You are more than Eve or Sarah,
blessed above all nobility, wisdom,and sanctity. (Sermon, Feast of theVisitation, 1537).
•••
One should honor Mary as she herself wished and as she expressed it in the Magnificat.
She praised God for his deeds.
How then can we praise her?
The true honor of Mary is the honor of God,
the praise of God's grace . . .
Mary is nothing for the sake of herself,
but for the sake of Christ . . .
Mary does not wish that we come to her,
but through her to God. (Explanation of the Magnificat, 1521).
•••
Luther gives the Blessed Virgin the exalted position of "Spiritual Mother"
for Christians:
It is the consolation and the superabundant goodness of God,
that man is able to exult in such a treasure.
Mary is his true Mother .. (Sermon, Christmas, 1522)
•••
Mary is the Mother of Jesus and the Mother of all of us even though it was Christ alone who reposed on her knees . . .
If he is ours,
we ought to be in his situation; there where he is,
we ought also to be and all that he has ought to be ours, and his mother is also our mother.
(Sermon, Christmas, 1529).
•••
Martin Luther had the belief of Mary's Immaculate Conception,
Luther's words follow:
It is a sweet and pious belief that the infusion of Mary's soul was effected without original sin;
so that in the very infusion of her soul she was also purified from original sin and adorned with God's gifts,
receiving a pure soul infused by God;
thus from the first moment she began to live she was free from allsin"
(Sermon: "On the Day of the Conception of the Mother of God," 1527).
•••
She is full of grace,
proclaimed to be entirely without sin- something exceedingly great.
For God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil.
(Personal {"Little"} Prayer Book, 1522).
•••
Martin Luther on Mary's Perpetual Virginity
Here are some of the founders of refom commenting on Mary:
Christ, our Savior,
was the real and natural fruit of Mary's virginal womb . . .
This was without the cooperationof a man,
and she remained a virgin after that.
{Luther's Works, eds. Jaroslav Pelikan (vols. 1-30) & Helmut T. Lehmann (vols. 31-55), St. Louis: Concordia Pub. House (vols. 1-30); Philadelphia: Fortress Press (vols. 31-55), 1955, v.22:23 / Sermons on John, chaps. 1-4 (1539) }
•••
Christ . . . was the only Son of Mary,
and the Virgin Mary bore no children besides Him . . .
I am inclined to agree with those who declare that 'brothers' really mean 'cousins' here,
for Holy Writ and the Jews always call cousins brothers.
{Pelikan, ibid., v.22:214-15 / Sermons on John, chaps. 1-4 (1539) }
•••
A new lie about me is being circulated.
I am supposed to have preached and written that Mary, the mother of God,
was not a virgin either before or after the birth of Christ . . .
{Pelikan, ibid.,v.45:199 / That Jesus Christ was Born a Jew (1523) }
•••
Scripture does not say or indicate that she later lost her virginity . . .
When Matthew [1:25]
says that Joseph did not know Mary carnally until she had brought forth her son,
it does not follow that he knew her subsequently;
on the contrary,
it means that he never did know her . . .
This babble . . .
is without justification . . .
he has neither noticed nor paid any attention to either Scripture or the common idiom.
{Pelikan, ibid.,v.45:206, 212-3 / That Jesus Christ was Born a Jew (1523) }
•••
Editor Jaroslav Pelikan (Lutheran) adds:
Luther . . . does not even consider the possibility that Mary might have had other children than Jesus.
This is consistent with his lifelong acceptance of the idea of the perpetual virginity of Mary.
{Pelikan, ibid.,v.22:214- 5}
•••
". . . she is full of grace, proclaimedto be entirely without sin. . . .
God's grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil. . . .
God is with her,
meaning that all she did or left undone is divine and the action ofGod in her.
Moreover, God guarded and protected her from all that might be hurtful to her."
Ref: Luther's Works, American edition, vol. 43, p. 40, ed. H. Lehmann, Fortress, 1968
•••
". . . she is rightly called not only the mother of the man, but also the Mother of God. . . .
{In Hilda Graef, Mary: A history of Doctrine and Devotion, combined ed. of vols. 1 & 2, London: Sheed &Ward, 1965, vol.2, pp.14-5}
•••
John Wesley
(Founder of Methodism)
The Blessed Virgin Mary, who, as well after as when she brought him forth,
continued a pure and unspotted virgin.
{"Letter to a Roman Catholic" / In This Rock, Nov. 1990, p.25}
•••
Lord Jesus,
let Your prayer of unity for Christians become a reality,
in Your way.
We have absolute confidence
that you can bring your people together,
we give you absolute permission to move.
Amen

101 Contradictions In The Bible


1.Who incited David to count the fighting men of Israel?
(a) God did (2 Samuel 24: 1)
(b) Satan did (I Chronicles 2 1:1)
2.In that count how many fighting men were found in Israel?
(a) Eight hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
(b) One million, one hundred thousand (IChronicles 21:5)
3. How many fighting men were found in Judah?
(a) Five hundred thousand (2 Samuel 24:9)
(b) Four hundred and seventy thousand (I Chronicles 21:5)
4.God sent his prophet to threaten David with how many years of famine?
(a) Seven (2 Samuel 24:13)
(b) Three (I Chronicles 21:12)
5.How old was Ahaziah when he began to rule over Jerusalem?
(a) Twenty-two (2 Kings 8:26)
(b) Forty-two (2 Chronicles 22:2)
6.How old was Jehoiachin when he became king of Jerusalem?
(a) Eighteen (2 Kings 24:8)
(b) Eight (2 Chronicles 36:9)
7.How long did he rule over Jerusalem?
(a) Three months (2 Kings 24:8)
(b) Three months and ten days (2 Chronicles 36:9)
8.The chief of the mighty men of David lifted up his spear and killed how many men at one time?
(a) Eight hundred (2 Samuel 23:8)
(b) Three hundred (I Chronicles 11: 11)
9.When did David bring the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem? Before defeating the Philistines or after?
(a) After (2 Samuel 5 and 6)
(b) Before (I Chronicles 13 and 14)
10.How many pairs of clean animals did God tell Noah to take into the Ark?
(a) Two (Genesis 6:19, 20)
(b) Seven (Genesis 7:2). But despite this last instruction only two pairs went into the ark (Genesis 7:8-9)
11.When David defeated the King of Zobah, how many horsemen did he capture?
(a) One thousand and seven hundred (2 Samuel 8:4)
(b) Seven thousand (I Chronicles 18:4)
12.How many stalls for horses did Solomon have?
(a) Forty thousand (I Kings 4:26)
(b) Four thousand (2 chronicles 9:25)
13.In what year of King Asa's reign did Baasha, King of Israel die?
(a) Twenty-sixth year (I Kings 15:33 - 16:8)
(b) Still alive in the thirty-sixth year (2 Chronicles 16:1)
14.How many overseers did Solomon appoint for the work of building the temple?
(a) Three thousand six hundred (2 Chronicles 2:2)
(b) Three thousand three hundred (I Kings 5:16)
15.Solomon built a facility containing how many baths?
(a) Two thousand (1 Kings 7:26)
(b) Over three thousand (2 Chronicles 4:5)
16.Of the Israelites who were freed from the Babylonian captivity, how many were the children of
Pahrath-Moab?
(a) Two thousand eight hundred and twelve (Ezra 2:6)
(b) Two thousand eight hundred and eighteen (Nehemiah 7:11)
17.How many were the children of Zattu?
(a) Nine hundred and forty-five (Ezra 2:8)
(b) Eight hundred and forty-five (Nehemiah 7:13)
18.How many were the children of Azgad?
(a) One thousand two hundred and twenty-two (Ezra 2:12)
(b) Two thousand three hundred and twenty-two (Nehemiah 7:17)
19.How many were the children of Adin?
(a) Four hundred and fifty-four (Ezra 2:15)
(b) Six hundred and fifty-five (Nehemiah 7:20)
20.How many were the children of Hashum?
(a) Two hundred and twenty-three (Ezra 2:19)
(b) Three hundred and twenty-eight (Nehemiah 7:22)
21.How many were the children of Bethel and Ai?
(a) Two hundred and twenty-three (Ezra 2:28)
(b) One hundred and twenty-three (Nehemiah 7:32)
22.Ezra 2:64 and Nehemiah 7:66 agree that the total number of the whole assembly was 42,360. Yet the
numbers do not add up to anything close. The totals obtained from each book is as follows:
(a) 29,818 (Ezra)
(b) 31,089 (Nehemiah)
23.How many singers accompanied the assembly?
(a) Two hundred (Ezra 2:65)
(b) Two hundred and forty-five (Nehemiah 7:67)
24.What was the name of King Abijah’s mother?
(a) Michaiah, daughter of Uriel of Gibeah (2 Chronicles 13:2)
(b) Maachah, daughter of Absalom (2 Chronicles 11:20) But Absalom had only one daughter whose name
was Tamar (2 Samuel 14:27)
25.Did Joshua and the Israelites capture Jerusalem?
(a) Yes (Joshua 10:23, 40)
(b) No (Joshua 15:63)
26.Who was the father of Joseph, husband of Mary?
(a) Jacob (Matthew 1:16)
(b) Hell (Luke 3:23)
27.Jesus descended from which son of David?
(a) Solomon (Matthew 1:6)
(b) Nathan (Luke3: 31)
28.Who was the father of Shealtiel?
(a) Jechoniah (Matthew 1:12)
(b) Neri’ (Luke 3:27)
29.Which son of Zerubbabel was an ancestor of Jesus Christ?
(a) Abiud (Matthew 1: 13)
(b) Rhesa (Luke 3:27) but the seven sons of Zerubbabel are as follows: i. Meshullam, ii. Hananiah, iii.
Hashubah, iv. Ohel, v. Berechiah, vi. Hasadiah, viii. Jushabhesed (I Chronicles 3:19, 20). The names
Abiud and Rhesa do not fit in anyway.
30.Who was the father of Uzziah?
(a) Joram (Matthew 1:8)
(b) Amaziah (2 Chronicles 26:1)
31.Who as the father of Jechoniah?
(a) Josiah (Matthew 1:11)
(b) Jeholakim (I Chronicles 3:16)
32.How many generations were there from the Babylonian exile until Christ?
(a) Matthew says fourteen (Matthew 1:17)
(b) But a careful count of the generations reveals only thirteen (see Matthew 1: 12-16)
33.Who was the father of Shelah?
(a) Cainan (Luke 3:35-36)
(b) Arphaxad (Genesis II: 12)
34.Was John the Baptist Elijah who was to come?
(a) Yes (Matthew II: 14, 17:10-13)
(b) No (John 1:19-21)
35.Would Jesus inherit David’s throne?
(a) Yes. So said the angel (Luke 1:32)
(b) No, since he is a descendant of Jehoiakim (see Matthew 1: I 1, I Chronicles 3:16). And Jehoiakim was
cursed by God so that none of his descendants can sit upon David’s throne (Jeremiah 36:30)
36.Jesus rode into Jerusalem on how many animals?
(a) One - a colt (Mark 11:7; cf Luke 19:3 5). “And they brought the colt to Jesus and threw their
garments on it; and he sat upon it.”
(b) Two - a colt and an ass (Matthew 21:7). “They brought the ass and the colt and put their garments
on them and he sat thereon.”
37.How did Simon Peter find out that Jesus was the Christ?
(a) By a revelation from heaven (Matthew 16:17)
(b) His brother Andrew told him (John 1:41)
38.Where did Jesus first meet Simon Peter and Andrew?
(a) By the Sea of Galilee (Matthew 4:18-22)
(b) On the banks of river Jordan (John 1:42). After that, Jesus decided to go to Galilee (John 1:43)
39.When Jesus met Jairus was Jairus’ daughter already dead?
(a) Yes. Matthew 9:18 quotes him as saying, “My daughter has just died.”
(b) No. Mark 5:23 quotes him as saying, “My little daughter is at the point of death.”
40.Did Jesus allow his disciples to keep a staff on their journey?
(a) Yes (Mark6: 8)
(b) No (Matthew 10:9; Luke 9:3)
41.Did Herod think that Jesus was John the Baptist?
(a) Yes (Matthew 14:2; Mark 6:16)
(b) No (Luke 9:9)
42.Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus before his baptism?
(a) Yes (Matthew 3:13-14)
(b) No (John 1:32,33)
43.Did John the Baptist recognize Jesus after his baptism?
(a) Yes (John 1:32, 33)
(b) No (Matthew 11:2)
44.According to the Gospel of John, what did Jesus say about bearing his own witness?
(a) “If I bear witness to myself, my testimony is not true” (John 5:3 1)
(b) “Even if I do bear witness to myself, my testimony is true” (John 8:14)
45.When Jesus entered Jerusalem did he cleanse the temple that same day?
(a) Yes (Matthew 21:12)
(b) No. He went into the temple and looked around, but since it was very late he did nothing. Instead, he
went to Bethany to spend the night and returned the next morning to cleanse the temple (Mark I 1:1-
17).
46.The Gospels say that Jesus cursed a fig tree. Did the tree wither at once?
(a) Yes. (Matthew 21:19)
(b) No. It withered overnight (Mark II: 20)
47.Did Judas kiss Jesus?
(a) Yes (Matthew 26:48-50)
(b) No. Judas could not get close enough to Jesus to kiss him (John 18:3-12)
48.What did Jesus say about Peter’s denial?
(a) “The cock will not crow till you have denied me three times” (John 13:38).
(b) “Before the cock crows twice you will deny me three times” (Mark 14:30). When the cock crowed
once, the three denials were not yet complete (see Mark 14:72). Therefore prediction (a) failed.
49.Did Jesus bear his own cross?
(a) Yes (John 19:17)
(b) No (Matthew 27:31-32)
50.Did Jesus die before the curtain of the temple was torn?
(a) Yes (Matthew27: 50-5 1;MarklS: 37-38)
(b) No. After the curtain was torn, then Jesus crying with a loud voice, said, “Father, into thy hands I
commit my spirit!” And having said this he breathed his last (Luke 23:45-46)
51.Did Jesus say anything secretly?
(a) No. “I have said nothing secretly” (John 18:20)
(b) Yes. “He did not speak to them without a parable, but privately to his own disciples he explained
everything” (Mark 4:34). The disciples asked him “Why do you speak to them in parables?” He said, “To
you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given”
(Matthew 13: 1 0-11)
52.Where was Jesus at the sixth hour on the day of the crucifixion?
(a) On the cross (Mark 15:23)
(b) In Pilate’s court (John 19:14)
53.The gospels say that two thieves were crucified along with Jesus. Did both thieves mock Jesus?
(a) Yes (Mark 15:32)
(b) No. One of them mocked Jesus, the other defended Jesus (Luke 23:43)
54.Did Jesus ascend to Paradise the same day of the crucifixion?
(a) Yes. He said to the thief who defended him, “Today you will be with me in Paradise” (Luke 23:43)
(b) No. He said to Mary Magdelene two days later, “I have not yet ascended to the Father” (John 20:17)
55.When Paul was on the road to Damascus he saw a light and heard a voice. Did those who were with
him hear the voice?
(a) Yes (Acts9: 7)
(b) No (Acts22: 9)
56.When Paul saw the light he fell to the ground. Did his traveling companions also fall to the ground?
(a) Yes (Acts 26:14)
(b) No (Acts 9:7)
57.Did the voice spell out on the spot what Paul’s duties were to be?
(a) Yes (Acts 26:16-18)
(b) No. The voice commanded Paul to go into the city of Damascus and there he will be told what he
must do. (Acts9: 7; 22: 10)
58.When the Israelites dwelt in Shittin they committed adultery with the daughters of Moab. God struck
them with a plague. How many people died in that plague?
(a) Twenty-four thousand (Numbers 25:1 and 9)
(b) Twenty-three thousand (I Corinthians 10:8)
59.How many members of the house of Jacob came to Egypt?
(a) Seventy souls (Genesis 4&27)
(b) Seventy-five souls (Acts 7:14)
60.What did Judas do with the blood money he received for betraying Jesus?
(a) He bought a field (Acts 1: 18)
(b) He threw all of it into the temple and went away. The priests could not put the blood money into the
temple treasury, so they used it to buy a field to bury strangers (Matthew 27:5)
61.How did Judas die?
(a) After he threw the money into the temple he went away and hanged himself (Matthew 27:5)
(b) After he bought the field with the price of his evil deed he fell headlong and burst open in the middle
and all his bowels gushed out (Acts 1:18)
62.Why is the field called “Field of Blood”?
(a) Because the priests bought it with the blood money (Matthew 27:8)
(b) Because of the bloody death of Judas therein (Acts 1:19)
63.Who is a ransom for whom?
(a) “The Son of Man came...to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). “Christ Jesus who gave
himself as a ransom for all... “(I Timothy 2:5-6)
(b) “The wicked is a ransom for the righteous, and the faithless for the upright” (Proverbs 21:18)
64.Is the Law of Moses useful?
(a) Yes. “All scripture is... profitable...” (2 Timothy 3:16)
(b) No. “ . . . A former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness... “(Hebrews
7:18)
65.What was the exact wording on the cross?
(a) “This is Jesus the King of the Jews” (Matthew 27:37)
(b) “The King of the Jews” (Mark 15:26)
(c) “This is the King of the Jews” (Luke 23:38)
(d) “Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews” (John 19:19)
66.Did Herod want to kill John the Baptist?
(a) Yes (Matthew 14:5)
(b) No. It was Herodias, the wife of Herod who wanted to kill him. But Herod knew that he was a
righteous man and kept him safe (Mark 6:20)
67.Who was the tenth disciple of Jesus in the list of twelve?
(a) Thaddaeus (Matthew 10: 1-4; Mark 3:13 -19)
(b) Judas son of James is the corresponding name in Luke’s gospel (Luke 6:12-16)
68.Jesus saw a man sit at the tax collector’s office and called him to be his disciple. What was his name?
(a) Matthew (Matthew 9:9)
(b) Levi (Mark 2:14; Luke 5:27)
69.Was Jesus crucified on the daytime before the Passover meal or the daytime after?
(a) After (Mark 14:12-17)
(b) Before. Before the feast of the Passover (John 1) Judas went out at night (John 13:30). The other
disciples thought he was going out to buy supplies to prepare for the Passover meal (John 13:29). When
Jesus was arrested, the Jews did not enter Pilate’s judgment hail because they wanted to stay clean to
eat the Passover (John 18:28). When the judgment was pronounced against Jesus, it was about the sixth
hour on the day of Preparation for the Passover (John 19:14)
70.Did Jesus pray to The Father to prevent the crucifixion?
(a) Yes. (Matthew 26:39; Mark 14:36; Luke 22:42)
(b) No. (John 12:27)
71.In the gospels which say that Jesus prayed to avoid the cross, how many times did ‘he move away
from his disciples to pray?
(a) Three (Matthew 26:36-46 and Mark 14:32-42)
(b) One. No opening is left for another two times. (Luke 22:39-46)
72.Matthew and Mark agree that Jesus went away and prayed three times. What were the words of the
second prayer?
(a) Mark does not give the words but he says that the words were the same as the first prayer (Mark
14:3 9)
(b) Matthew gives us the words, and we can see that they are not the same as in the first (Matthew
26:42)
73.What did the centurion say when Jesus dies?
(a) “Certainly this man was innocent” (Luke 23:47)
(b) “Truly this man was the Son of God” (Mark 15:39)
74.When Jesus said “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken Me? ” in what language did he speak?
(a) Hebrew: the words are “Eloi, Eloi…“(Matthew 27:46)
(b) Aramaic: the words are “Eloi, Eloi... “(Mark 15:34)
75.According to the gospels, what were the last words of Jesus before he died?
(a) “Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit!” (Luke 23:46)
(b) "It is finished" (John 19:30).
76.When Jesus entered Capernaum he healed the slave of a centurion. Did the centurion come personally
to request Jesus for this?
(a) Yes (Matthew 8:5)
(b) No. He sent some elders of the Jews and his friends (Luke 7:3,6)
77. (a) Adam was told that if and when he eats the forbidden fruit he would die the same day (Genesis
2:17)
(b) Adam ate the fruit and went on to live to a ripe old age of 930 years (Genesis 5:5)
78. (a) God decided that the life span of humans will be limited to 120 years (Genesis 6:3)
(b) Many people born after that lived longer than 120. Arpachshad lived 438 years. His son Shelah lived
433 years. His son Eber lived 464 years, etc. (Genesis 11:12-16)
79.Apart from Jesus did anyone else ascend to heaven?
(a) No (John 3:13)
(b) Yes. “And Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven” (2 Kings 2:11)
80.Who was high priest when David went into the house of God and ate the consecrated bread?
(a) Abiathar (Mark 2:26)
(b) Ahimelech, the father of Abiathar (I Samuel 1:1; 22:20)
81.Was Jesus’ body wrapped in spices before burial in accordance with Jewish burial customs?
(a) Yes and his female disciples witnessed his burial (John 19:39-40)
(b) No. Jesus was simply wrapped in a linen shroud. Then the women bought and prepared spices “so
that they may go and anoint him [Jesus)” (Mark 16: 1)
82.When did the women buy the spices?
(a) After “the Sabbath was past” (Mark 16:1)
(b) Before the Sabbath. The women “prepared spices and ointments.” Then, “on the Sabbath they rested
according to the commandment” (Luke 23:55 to 24:1)
83.At what time of day did the women visit the tomb?
(a) “Toward the dawn” (Matthew 28: 1)
(b) “When the sun had risen” (Mark 16:2)
84.What was the purpose for which the women went to the tomb?
(a) To anoint Jesus’ body with spices (Mark 16: 1; Luke 23:55 to 24: 1)
(b) To see the tomb. Nothing about spices here (Matthew 28: 1)
(c) For no specified reason. In this gospel the wrapping with spices had been done before the Sabbath
(John 20: 1)
85.A large stone was placed at the entrance of the tomb. Where was the stone when the women arrived?
(a) They saw that the stone was “Rolled back” (Mark 16:4) They found the stone “rolled away from the
tomb” (Luke 24:2) They saw that “the stone had been taken away from the tomb” (John 20:1)
(b) As the women approached, an angel descended from heaven, rolled away the stone, and conversed
with the women. Matthew made the women witness the spectacular rolling away of the stone (Matthew
28:1-6)
86.Did anyone tell the women what happened to Jesus’ body?
(a) Yes. “A young man in a white robe” (Mark 16:5). “Two men ... in dazzling apparel” later described as
angels (Luke 24:4 and 24:23). An angel - the one who rolled back the stone (Matthew 16:2). In each
case the women were told that Jesus had risen from the dead (Matthew 28:7; Mark 16:6; Luke 24:5
footnote)
(b) No. Mary met no one and returned saying, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not
know where they have laid him” (John 20:2)
87.When did Mary Magdelene first meet the resurrected Jesus? And how did she react?
(a) Mary and the other women met Jesus on their way back from their first and only visit to the tomb.
They took hold of his feet and worshipped him (Matthew 28:9)
(b) On her second visit to the tomb Mary met Jesus just outside the tomb. When she saw Jesus she did
not recognize him. She mistook him for the gardener. She still thinks that Jesus’ body is laid to rest
somewhere and she demands to know where. But when Jesus said her name she at once recognized him
and called him “Teacher.” Jesus said to her, “Do not hold me...” (John 20:11 to 17)
88.What was Jesus’ instruction for his disciples?
(a) “Tell my brethren to go to Galilee, and there they will see me” (Matthew 2 8: 10)
(b) “Go to my brethren and say to them, I am ascending to my Father and your Father, to my God and
your God” (John 20:17)
89.When did the disciples return to Galilee?
(a) Immediately, because when they saw Jesus in Galilee “some doubted” (Matthew 28:17). This period
of uncertainty should not persist
(b) After at least 40 days. That evening the disciples were still in Jerusalem (Luke 24:3 3). Jesus
appeared to them there and told them, stay in the city until you are clothed with power from on high”
(Luke 24:49). He was appearing to them “during forty days” (Acts 1:3), and “charged them not to depart
from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise ... “(Acts 1:4)
90.To whom did the Midianites sell Joseph?
(a) “To the Ishmaelites” (Genesis 37:28)
(b) “To Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh” (Genesis 37:36)
91.Who brought Joseph to Egypt?
(a) The Ishmaelites bought Joseph and then “took Joseph to Egypt” (Genesis 37:28)
(b) “The Midianites had sold him in Egypt” (Genesis 37:36)
(c) Joseph said to his brothers “I am your brother, Joseph, whom you sold into Egypt” (Genesis 45:4)
92.Does God change his mind?
(a) Yes. “The word of the Lord came to Samuel: “I repent that I have made Saul King...” (I Samuel 15:10
to 11)
(b) No. God “will not lie or repent; for he is not a man, that he should repent” (I Samuel 15:29)
(c) Yes. “And the Lord repented that he had made Saul King over Israel” (I Samuel 15:35). Notice that
the above three quotes are all from the same chapter of the same book! In addition, the Bible shows that
God repented on several other occasions:
i. “The Lord was sorry that he made man” (Genesis 6:6)
“I am sorry that I have made them” (Genesis 6:7)
ii. “And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do to his people” (Exodus 32:14).
iii. (Lots of other such references).
93.The Bible says that for each miracle Moses and Aaron demonstrated the magicians did the same by
their secret arts. Then comes the following feat:
(a) Moses and Aaron converted all the available water into blood (Exodus 7:20-21)
(b) The magicians did the same (Exodus 7:22). This is impossible, since there would have been no water
left to convert into blood.
94.Who killed Goliath?
(a) David (I Samuel 17:23, 50)
(b) Elhanan (2 Samuel 21:19)
95.Who killed Saul?
(a) “Saul took his own sword and fell upon it.... Thus Saul died... (I Samuel 31:4-6)
(b) An Amalekite slew him (2 Samuel 1:1- 16)
96.Does every man sin?
(a) Yes. “There is no man who does not sin” (I Kings 8:46; see also 2 Chronicles 6:36; Proverbs 20:9;
Ecclesiastes 7:20; and I John 1:810)
(b) No. True Christians cannot possibly sin, because they are the children of God. “Every one who
believes that Jesus is the Christ is a child of God. (I John 5:1). “We should be called children of God; and
so we are” (I John 3: 1). “He who loves is born of God” (I John 4:7). “No one born of God commits sin;
for God’s nature abides in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God” (I John 3:9). But, then
again, Yes! “If we say we have no sin we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us” (I John 1:8)
97.Who will bear whose burden?
(a) “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Galatians 6:2)
(b) “Each man will have to bear his own load” (Galatians 6:5)
98.How many disciples did Jesus appear to after his resurrection?
(a) Twelve (I Corinthians 15:5)
(b) Eleven (Matthew 27:3-5 and Acts 1:9-26, see also Matthew 28:16; Mark 16:14 footnote; Luke 24:9;
Luke 24:3 3)
99.Where was Jesus three days after his baptism?
(a) After his baptism, “the spirit immediately drove him out into the wilderness. And he was in the
wilderness forty days ... (Mark 1:12-13)
(b) Next day after the baptism, Jesus selected two disciples. Second day: Jesus went to Galilee - two
more disciples. Third day: Jesus was at a wedding feast in Cana in Galilee (see John 1:35; 1:43; 2:1-11)
100.Was baby Jesus’ life threatened in Jerusalem?
(a) Yes, so Joseph fled with him to Egypt and stayed there until Herod died (Matthew 2:13 23)
(b) No. The family fled nowhere. They calmly presented the child at the Jerusalem temple according to
the Jewish customs and returned to Galilee (Luke 2:21-40)
101.When Jesus walked on water how did the disciples respond?
(a) They worshipped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God” (Matthew 14:33)
(b) “They were utterly astounded, for they did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were
hardened” (Mark 6:51-52)https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=gmail&attid=0.1&thid=13aa30c22faadfe9&mt=application/pdf&url=https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D4808a678bb%26view%3Datt%26th%3D13aa30c22faadfe9%26attid%3D0.1%26disp%3Dsafe%26realattid%3Dfile0%26zw&sig=AHIEtbTiFV7e1seTz_d2YzU0c0RwjfX5qg

INFALLIBLE AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH.


The Church has authority from God to teach regarding faith and morals,
and in her teaching she is preserved from error by the special guidance of the Holy Ghost.
The prerogative of infallibility is clearly deduced from the attributes of the Church already mentioned.
The Church is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic.
Preaching the same creed everywhere and at all times; teaching holiness and truth, she is, of course,
essentially unerring in her doctrine;
for what is one,
holy or unchangeable must be infallibly true.
That the Church was infallible in the Apostolic age is denied by no Christian.
We never question the truth of the Apostles’ declarations;
they were, in fact,
the only authority in the Church for the first century.
The New Testament was not completed till the close of the first century.
There is no just ground for denying to the Apostolic teachers of the nineteenth century in which we live a prerogative clearlypossessed by those of the first,
especially as the Divine Word nowhere intimates that this unerring guidance was to die with the Apostles.
On the contrary,
as the Apostles transmitted to their successors their power to preach, to baptize, to ordain, to confirm, etc.,
they must also have handed downto them the no less essential gift of infallibility.
God loves us as much as He loved the primitive Christians;
Christ died for us as well as for them and we have as much need of unerring teachers as they had.
It will not suffice to tell me: “We have an infallible Scripture as a substitute for an infallible apostolate of the first century,”
for an infallible book is of no use to me without an infallible interpreter,
as the history of Protestantism too clearly demonstrates.
But besides these presumptive arguments,
we have positive evidence from Scripture that the Church cannot err in her teachings.
Our blessed Lord,
in constituting St. Peter Prince of His Apostles,
says to him:
“Thou art Peter,
and upon this rock I will build My Church,
and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
Christ makes here a solemn prediction that no error shall ever invade His Church,
and if she fell into error the gates of hell have certainly prevailed against her.
The Reformers of the sixteenth century affirm that the Church did fall into error;
that the gates of hell did prevail against her;
that from the sixth to the sixteenth century she was a sink of iniquity.
The Book of Homilies of the Church of England says that the Church
“lay buried in damnable idolatry for eight hundred years or more.”
The personal veracity of our Savior and of the Reformers is here at issue,
for our Lord makes a statement which they contradict.
Who is to be believed,
Jesus or the Reformers?
If the prediction of our Savior about the preservation of His Church from error be false,
then Jesus Christ is not God, since God cannot lie.
He is not even a prophet,
since He predicted falsehood.
Nay, He is an impostor,
and all Christianity is a miserable failure and a huge deception,
since it rests on a false Prophet.
But if Jesus predicted the truth when He declared that the gates of hell should not prevail against His Church
—and who dare deny it?
—then the Church never has and never could have fallen from the truth;
then the Catholic Church is infallible,
for she alone claims that prerogative,
and she is the only Church that is acknowledged to have existed from the beginning.
Truly is Jesus that wise Architect mentioned in the Gospel,
“who built his house upon a rock;
and the rain fell,
and the floods came,
and the winds blew,
and they beat upon that house, and it fell not,
for it was founded upon a rock.”
Jesus sends forth the Apostles with plenipotentiary powers to preach the Gospel.
“As the Father,”
He says,
“hath sent Me,
I also send you.”
“Going therefore,
teach all nations,
teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.”
“Preach the Gospel to every creature.”
“Ye shall be witnesses unto Me in Jerusalem,
and in all Judea,
and Samaria,
and even to the uttermost part of the earth.”
This commission evidently applies not to the Apostles only,
but also to their successors,
to the end of time,
since it was utterly impossible for the Apostles personally to preach to the whole world.
Not only does our Lord empower His Apostles to preach the Gospel,
but He commands,
and under the most severe penalties,
those to whom they preach to listen and obey.
“Whosoever will not receive you,
nor hear your words,
going forth from that house or city,
shake the dust from your feet.
Amen, I say to you,
it shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment than for that city.”
“If he will not hear the Church, let him be to thee as the heathen andthe publican.”
“He that believeth shall be saved;
he that believeth not shall be condemned.”
“He that heareth you heareth Me;
he that despiseth you despiseth Me;
and he that despiseth Me despiseth Him that sent Me.”

in fact, that the definition was a mistake, and that the blunder of 1854 would be repaired in 1869.” I told him, of..

night,
that he is steering his course directly to the city of his destination;
and is not an infallible guide as necessary to conduct you to the city of God in heaven?
Is it not, moreover,
a blessing and a consolation that,
amid the ever-changing views of men,
amid the conflict of human opinion and the tumultuous waves of human passion,
there is one voice heard above the din and uproar,
crying in clear,
unerring tones:
“Thus saith the Lord?”
It is very strange that the Catholic Church must apologize to the world for simply declaring
that she speaks the truth,
the whole truth,
and nothing but the truth.
The Roman Pantheon was dedicated to all the gods of the Empire,
and their name was legion.
Formidable also in numbers are the Founders of the religious sects existing in our country.
A Pantheon as vast as Westminster Abbey would hardly be spacious enough to contain life-sized statues for their accommodation.
If you were to confront those figures,
and to ask them,
one by one,
to give an account of the faith they had professed,
and if they were endowed with the gift of speech,
you would find that no two of them were in entire accord,
but that they all differed among themselves on some fundamental principle of revelation.
Would you not be acting very unwisely and be hazarding your soul’s salvation
in submitting to the teachings of so many discordant and conflicting oracles.
Children of the Catholic Church,
give thanks to God that you are members of that Communion,
which proclaims year after year the one same and unalterable message of truth,
peace and love,
and that you are preserved from all errors in faith,
and from all illusion in the practiceof virtue.
You are happily strangers to thoseinterior conflicts,
to those perplexing doubts and tothat frightful uncertainty which distracts the souls
of those whose private judgment is their only guide,
who are
“ever learning and never attainingto the knowledge of the truth.”
You are not, like others,
drifting helplessly over the ocean of uncertainty and “carried about by every wind of doctrine.”
You are not as “blind men led by blind guides.”
You are not like those who are in the midst of a spiritual desert intersected by various by-paths,
not knowing which to pursue;
but you are on that high road spoken of by the prophet Isaiah, which is so
"straight a way that fools shall noterr therein.”
You are a part of that universal Communion which has no “High Church” and “Low Church;” no
“New School” and
“Old School,”
for you all belong to that School which is
“ever ancient and ever new.”
You enjoy that profound peace and tranquillity which springs from the conscious possession of the whole truth.
Well may you exclaim:
“Behold how good and how pleasant it is for brethren to dwelltogether in unity.”
Give thanks, moreover,
to God that you belong to a Church which has also a keen sense to detect and expose those moral shams,
those pious frauds,
those socialistic schemes which are so often undertaken in this country ostensibly in the name of religion and morality, but which, in reality,
are subversive of morality and order,
which are the offspring of fanaticism,
and serve as a mask to hide the most debasing passions.
Neither Mormons nor Millerites,
nor the advocates of free love or of women’s rights,
so called,
find any recruits in the Catholic Church.
She will never suffer her children to be ensnared by these impostures,
how specious soever they may be.
From what has been said in the preceding pages,
it follows that the Catholic Church cannot be reformed.
I do not mean, of course,
that the Pastors of the Church are personally impeccable or not subject to sin.
Every teacher in the Church, from the Pope down to the humblest Priest,
is liable at any moment,
like any of the faithful,
to fall from grace and to stand in need of moral reformation.
We all carry
“this treasure
(of innocence)
in earthen vessels.”
My meaning is that the Church is not susceptible of being reformedin her doctrines.
The Church is the work of an Incarnate God.
Like all God’s works,
it is perfect.
It is, therefore,
incapable of reform.
Is it not the height of presumption for men to attempt to improve upon the work of God?
Is it not ridiculous for the Luthers,the Calvins,
the Knoxes and the Henries and a thousand lesser lights
to be offering their amendments to the Constitution of the Church,
as if it were a human Institution?
Our Lord Himself has never ceasedto rule personally over His Church.
It is time enough for little men to take charge of the Ship when the great Captain abandons the helm.
A Protestant gentleman of very liberal education remarked to me,
before the opening of the late Ecumenical Council:
“I am assured, sir, by a friend, in confidence, that,
at a secret Conclave of Bishops recently held in Rome
it was resolved that the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception wouldbe reconsidered and abolished at the approaching General Council;

What "No Salvation Outside the Church" Means

One of the most misunderstood teachings of the Catholic Church isthis one: Outside the Church there is no salvation"
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus).
Those trying to grasp the meaning of this teaching often struggle with its formulations by various Church Fathers and Church Councils down through history.
Of course,
to understand an isolated formulation of any Church teaching,
one must study the historical context within which it was written: why it was written, what was going on in the Church at thetime,
who the intended audience was, and so on.
One must discover how the magisterium (teaching office) of the Church understands its own teaching.
If someone fails to do this and chooses, rather,
to simply treat a particular formulation as a stand-alone teaching,
he runs the risk of seriously misunderstandin g it.
In recent times,
the Church has recognized that itsteaching about the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation has been widely misunderstood,
so it has "re-formulated" this teaching in a positive way.
Here is how the Catechism of the Catholic Church begins to address this topic:
"How are we to understand this affirmation, often repeated by the Church Fathers?
Reformulated positively,
it means that all salvation comes from Christ the Head through the Church which is his Body" (CCC 846).
In keeping with the Church’s current spirit of ecumenism, this positive reformulation comes across less harshly than previous negative formulations.
Even so, it remains quite controversial.
So, let’s see how this new formulation squares with Scripture.
Jesus, the Way
The first part of the reformulated teaching
—"all salvation comes from Christ the Head"
—is quite easy for all Christians, even non-Catholics, to understandand embrace.
It echoes Jesus’ own words recorded by John:
"I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me"
(Jn 14:6).
So, Christians unanimously agree on this first part.
But is this all that needs to be saidabout how one may be saved?
The Catholic Church has historically recognized the importance of explaining further the means through which salvation is offered through Christ.
When speaking of salvation, Jesus offered more details than just his words quoted above.
For example,
consider these three verses:
He who believes and is baptized will be saved.
(Mk 16:16)
[U]nless you repent you will all likewise perish.
(Lk 13:3)
[H]e who eats my flesh and drinksmy blood has eternal life,
and I will raise him up at the last day.
(Jn 6:54)
Notice that in these three verses Jesus associated salvation with baptism, confession, and the Eucharist, respectively.
Catholics recognize that these sacraments are administered through the Church.
In fact,
in the case of the latter two,
a validly ordained priest is necessary for their administration, so the sacrament of ordination must also be associated with salvation.
A primary role of the Catholic Church in conjunction with salvation is becoming quite clear.
This brings us to the second part of the Catechism’s formulation of the doctrine being considered: ". ..
through the Church which is his Body."
With Him or Against Him
Since the sacraments are the ordinary means through which Christ offers the grace necessary for salvation,
and the Catholic Church that Christestablished is the ordinary minister of those sacraments,
it is appropriate to state that salvation comes through the Church.
This is not unlike the situation that existed prior to the establishment of the Catholic Church.
Even before it was fully revealed that he was the Messiah,
Jesus himself taught that"salvation is from the Jews" (Jn 4:22).
He pointed the woman of Samariato the body of believers existing at that time, through which salvation would be offered to all mankind:
the Jews.
In a similar fashion,
now that the Messiah has established his Church,
Jesus might say,
"salvation is from the Catholics"!
Recognizing this,
we can see why the Church, especially during times of mass exodus
(such as has happened in times when heresies have run rampant),
has been even more forceful in the way it has taught this doctrine.
Instead of simply pointing out how God offers salvation from Christ, through the Church,
the Church has warned that there is no salvation apart from Christ, outside his Church.
Since Jesus established the Catholic Church as necessary for salvation,
those who knowingly and willingly reject him or his Church cannot be saved.
We see this in Jesus’ teaching: "Hewho is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather with me scatters" (Mt 12:30).
Also: "[I]f he [a sinning brother] refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector"
(Mt 18:17).
Paul warned similarly:
"As for a man who is factious, after admonishing him once or twice,
have nothing more to do with him,
knowing that such a person is perverted and sinful;
he is self-condemned"
(Ti 3:10-11)

How Did the Catholic Church Get Her Name?

BY Arch-legend DE Marie on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 12:36pm ·
The Creed which we recite on Sundays and holy days speaks of one, holy,
catholic and apostolic Church.
As everybody knows, however, the Church referred to in this Creed is more commonly called just the Catholic Church.
It is not, by the way,
properly called the Roman Catholic Church,
but simply the CatholicChurch.
The term Roman Catholic is not used bythe Church herself;
it is a relatively modern term, and one,moreover,
that is confined largely to the English language.
The English-speakin g bishops at the First Vatican Council in 1870, in fact,
conducted a vigorous and successful campaign to insure that the term Roman Catholic was nowhere included in any of the Council's official documents about the Church herself,
and the term was not included.
Similarly, nowhere in the 16 documents of the Second Vatican Council will you find the term Roman Catholic.
Pope Paul VI signed all the documents of the Second Vatican Councilas
"I, Paul. Bishop of the Catholic Church."
Simply that -- CatholicChurch.
There are references to the Roman curia,
the Roman missal,
the Roman rite, etc.,
but when the adjectiveRoman is applied to the Church herself,
it refers to the Diocese of Rome!
Cardinals, for example,
are called cardinals of the Holy Roman Church,
but that designation means that when they are named to be cardinals they have thereby become honorary clergy of theHoly Father's home diocese, the Diocese of Rome.
Each cardinal is given a titular church in Rome,
and when the cardinalsparticipate in the election of a new pope.
they are participating in a process that in ancient times was carried out by the clergy of the Diocese of Rome.
Although the Diocese of Rome is central to the Catholic Church,
this does not mean that the Roman rite, or,
as is sometimes said,
the Latin rite,
is co-terminus with theChurch as a whole;
that would mean neglecting the Byzantine, Chaldean, Maronite or other Oriental rites which are all very much part of the Catholic Church today,
as in the past.
In our day,
much greater emphasis has been given to these
"non-Roman" rites of the Catholic Church.
The Second Vatican Council devoted a special document, Orientalium Ecclesiarum (Decree on Eastern Catholic Churches),
to the Eastern rites which belong to the Catholic Church, and the new Catechism of the Catholic Church similarly gives considerable attentionto the distinctive traditions and spirituality of these Eastern rites.
So the proper name for the universal Church is not the Roman Catholic Church.
Far from it.
That term caught on mostly in English-speakin g countries;
it was promoted mostlyby Anglicans,
supporters of the"branch theory" of theChurch, namely, that the one, holy,
catholic and apostolic Church of the creed was supposed to consist of three major branches, the Anglican,
the Orthodox and the so-called Roman Catholic.
It was to avoid that kind of interpretation that the English-speakin g bishops at Vatican I succeeded in warning the Church away from ever using the term officially herself:
It too easily could be misunderstood.
Today in an era of widespread dissent in the Church,
and of equally widespread confusion regarding what authentic Catholic identity is supposed toconsist of,
many loyal Catholics have recently taken tousing the term Roman Catholic in order to affirm their understanding that theCatholic Church of the Sunday creed is the same Church that is united with the Vicar of Christ in Rome,
the Pope.
This understanding of theirs is correct,
but such Catholics should nevertheless beware of using the term,
not only because of itsdubious origins in Anglican circles intending to suggest that there just might be some other CatholicChurch around somewhere besides the Roman one:
but also because it often still is used today to suggest that the Roman Catholic Church is something other and lesser than the Catholic Church of the creed.
It is commonly used bysome dissenting theologians,
for example,
who appear to be attempting to categorize the Roman Catholic Church as justanother contemporary"Christian denomination"
--not the body that is identical with the one, holy,
catholic and apostolic Church of the creed.
The proper name of the Church, then,
is the Catholic Church.
It is not ever called
"the Christian Church,"either.
Although the prestigious Oxford University Press currently publishes a learned and rather useful reference book called "The Oxford Book of the Christian Church,"
the fact is that there has never been a major entity in historycalled by that name;
the Oxford University Press has adopted a misnomer,
for the Church of Christ has never been called the Christian Church.
There is, of course,
a Protestant denomination in the United States which does call itself by that name,
but that particular denomination is hardlywhat the Oxford University Press had inmind when assigning toits reference book thetitle that it did.
The assignment of the title in question appears to have been one more method,
of which there have been so many down through history,
of declining to admit that there is, in fact,
one--and only one--entity existing inthe world today to which the designation
"the Catholic Church" in the Creed might possibly apply.
The entity in question,
of course, is just that:
the very visible,
worldwide Catholic Church,
in which the 263rd successor of the Apostle Peter,
Pope John Paul II, teaches, governs and sanctifies,
along with some 3,000 other bishops around the world,
who are successors of the apostles of Jesus Christ.
As mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles,
it is true that the followers of Christ early became known as "Christians" (cf. Acts 11:26).
The name Christian, however, was never commonly applied to the Church herself.
In the New Testament itself, the Church is simply called "the Church."
There was only one.
In that early time there were not yet anybreak-away bodies substantial enough to be rival claimants of the name and from which the Church mightever have to distinguish herself.
Very early in post-apostolic times, however.
the Church did acquirea proper name--and precisely in order to distinguish herself from rival bodies whichby then were already beginning to form.
The name that the Church acquired when it became necessary for her to have a proper name was the name by which she hasbeen known ever since-the Catholic Church.
The name appears in Christian literature forthe first time around the end of the first century.
By the time it was written down,
it had certainly already been in use,
for the indications are that everybody understood exactly what was meant by thename when it was written.
Around the year A.D. 107,
a bishop,
St. Ignatius of Antioch in the Near East, was arrested, brought to Rome by armed guardsand eventually martyred there in the arena.
In a farewell letter which this early bishopand martyr wrote to his fellow Christians in Smyrna
(today Izmir in modernTurkey), he made the first written mention inhistory of
"the Catholic Church."
He wrote,
"Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" (To the Smyrnaeans 8:2).
Thus, the second century of Christianityhad scarcely begun when the name of the Catholic Church was already in use.
Thereafter, mention ofthe name became more and more frequent in the writtenrecord.
It appears in the oldest written account we possess outside the New Testament of the martyrdom of a Christian for his faith,
the "Martyrdom of St. Polycarp,"
bishop of the same Church of Smyrna to which St. Ignatius of Antioch had written.
St. Polycarp was martyred around 155,
and the account of his sufferings dates back to that time.
The narrator informs us that in his final prayers before giving up his life for Christ,
St. Polycarp"remembered all who had met with him at any time,
both small and great,
both those with and those without renown,
and the whole Catholic Church throughout theworld."
We know that St. Polycarp,
at the time of his death in 155, had beena Christian for 86 years.
He could not, therefore,
have been born much later than 69 or 70.
Yet it appears to havebeen a normal part of the vocabulary of a man of this era to be able to speak of "the whole Catholic Church throughout the world."
The name had caught on,
and no doubt for good reasons.
The term "catholic" simply means"universal," and when employing it in those early days,
St. Ignatius of Antioch and
St. Polycarp of Smyrnawere referring to the Church that was already "everywhere,"
as distinguished from whatever sects,
schisms or splinter groups might have grown up here and there,
in opposition to the Catholic Church.
The term was already understood even then to be an especially fitting name because the Catholic Church was for everyone,
not just for adepts,
enthusiasts or the specially initiated who might have been attracted to her.
Again, it was already understood that the Church was "catholic" because
-- to adopt a modern expression
-- she possessed the fullness of the means of salvation.
She also was destined to be "universal" in time as well as in space,
and it was to her that applied the promise of Christ to Peter and theother apostles that"the powers of death shall not prevail" against her (Mt 16:18).
The Catechism of the Catholic Church in our own day has concisely summed up all the reasons why the name of the Church of Christhas been the Catholic Church:
"The Church is catholic,"
the Catechism teaches, "[because] she proclaims the fullness of the faith.
She bears in herself and administers the totality of the means of salvation.
She is sent out to all peoples. She speaks toall men.
She encompasses all times. She is 'missionary of her very nature'" (no. 868).
So the name became attached to her for good.
By the time of the firstecumenical council of the Church,
held at Nicaea in Asia Minor in the year 325 A.D.,
the bishops of that council were legislating quite naturally in the name of the universal body they called in the Council of Nicaea's official documents "theCatholic Church."
As most people know, it was that same council which formulated the basic Creed in which the term "catholic" was retained as one of the four marks of the trueChurch of Christ.
And it is the same name which is to be found in all 16 documents of the twenty-first ecumenical council of the Church, Vatican Council II.
It was still back in the fourth century that St.Cyril of Jerusalem aptly wrote,
"Inquire not simply where the Lord's house is,
for the sects of the profane also make an attempt to call their own dens the houses of the Lord;
nor inquire merely where the church is,
but where the Catholic Church is.
For this is the peculiarname of this Holy Body,
the Mother of all,
which is the Spouse of Our Lord Jesus Christ" (Catecheses, xviii, 26).
The same inquiry needs to be made in exactly the same way today,
for the name of the true Church of Christ has in no way been changed.
It was inevitable that the Catechism of the Catholic Church would adopt the same name today that the Church has had throughout the whole of her very long history.

WHAT WE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THE COMING OF JESUS CHRIST

BY Arch-legend DE Marie on Wednesday, October 24, 2012 at 12:32pm ·
 
Matthew 24:42 “Watch therefore: for ye knownot what hour your Lord doth come.”
Jesus’ followers in the first century were very eager for the endto come. As we will see, some of them did conclude that the end was imminent, coming right away. Their view needed to be corrected. But it certainly is not bad forChristians, then or now, to believe sincerely that the foretold end must be treated as close and to live daily with that awareness.
In answering his disciples’ question about “the sign” of hispresence, Jesus warned what is found in our featured text. Such alertness should have affected their actions, for Christ added: “And take heedto yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come uponyou unawares.For as asnare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth.Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may beaccounted worthy to escape all these thingsthat shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man..”—Luke 21:34-36.
Note that Jesus gave this advice just after outlining events that would make up “the sign.” So the apostles were alerted to the fact that certain things had to develop historically before the end. Nonetheless, a few weeks later, they asked the resurrectedJesus: “Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?And he said unto them, It is not foryou to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power..”—Acts 1:6, 7.
We can see from this that Jesus’ closest followers were so anxious for the end to come quickly that theyoverlooked what he had recently told themabout physical evidences that had to develop during his kingship prior to that end.
We find another indication of their eagerness in the apostle Paul’s letters to Thessalonian Christians. About 50 A.D. he wrote:” But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you. For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night….Therefor e let usnot sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober..” (1 Thessalonians 5:1, 2, 6) Some of those spirit-anointed Christians took that tomean that Jesus’ day (day for executing thewicked) was coming right then, immediately.
But not so. In fact, Paul wrote them in a second letter: “Now webeseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering togetherunto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that theday of Christ is at hand.Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, exceptthere come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;.”—2 Thessalonians 2:1-3.
This did not mean that they could be casual about Jesus’ kingship and the end of the world. With each passing year, Jesus’ warning became ever more poignant: “Watchtherefore: for ye knownot what hour your Lord doth come.”.”
Thus, about five yearsafter writing Second Thessalonians, Paul wrote: “ And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: fornow is our salvation nearer than when we believed.The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light” (Romans 13:11, 12) After five more years, Paul advised Hebrew Christians: “’ For ye have need of patience,that, after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise. For yet a little while, and he thatshall come will come, and will not tarry.” (Hebrews 10:36, 37) Then, in the penultimate verse of Revelation, the apostleJohn wrote: “He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus.”Revelation 22:20.
Unquestionably, a Christian way back then was not being unreasonable to feel that the end could come in his lifetime. And if through accident or natural processes, he should die before the end, he would have lived with the valid sense of urgency that Jesus and the inspired Scriptures generated.
All of this is even moreapplicable to us, at thelate hour in which we live. Paraphrasing Paul’s words, we cannot deny that ‘now our salvation is nearerthan at the time when the early Christians became believers and even than when we ourselves became believers. The night is well along; the day certainly has drawn near.’
We have been able to see in history , the physical evidence piling mountain high, evidence that proves that we are near the end. . Rather than be preoccupied with guessing just when theend will occur, we should be occupied with spreading the gospel which can save our lives and the lives of many others.—1 Timothy 4:16.
We have ample reasons to expect thatall this will be completed in our time. Does that mean beforethe turn of a new month, a new year, a new decade, a new century? No human knows, for Jesus said that ‘even the angels of the heavens’ did not know that. (Matthew 24:36) Furthermore, we do not need to know as we continue doing what the Lord commands us to concentrate on doing. What is most importantis that God’s will and work be done and thatwe have the fullest share in that. Thus we “escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man..”—Luke 21:36.
I can not speak for you , but I am ready!,,,Come, Lord Jesus , COME!

Thursday, 20 September 2012

THE CATHOLIC SAINTS AND MATYRS


Martyr Saints

The history of the Church is full of many Martyred Catholic saints, who received recognition for great deeds or meritorious conduct. Many lost their lives in defense of the faith, while others were themselves the mothers of important saints. Many were also honored for their contributions to the Church and their community.
More information on Martyr's
St. Abadiu
St. Abakuh
St. Abamon (Apa Pamun)
St. Abundius
St. Acepsius
St. Adrio
St. Afra
Bl. Agnes Takea
Bl. Agnes Tsao-Kouy
St. Agricola
St. Alban
St. Alexander
St. Alexander
Bl. Alexander of Lugo
Bl. Alexius Nakamura
St. Alphege
Bl. Alphonsus de Mena
St. Altinus
Bl. Ambrose Fernandez
St. Ambrose Kibuka
St. Anatole Kiriggwajjo
St. Andrew Wouters
Bl. Angelus Orsucci
St. Anicetus
St. Anthimus
Bl. Anthony
St. Anthony Daniel
Bl. Anthony Fantosat
Bl. Anthony Kiun
Bl. Anthony of Korea
Bl. Anthony of St. Bonaventure
Bl. Anthony of Tuy
St. Anthony Peter Dich
Bl. Anthony Turner
St. Anysia
St. Aphrodisius
St. Apollinaris Franco
St. Apollonius
St. Appian
St. Arcontius
St. Argymirus
St. Ariadne
St. Arialdus
St. Arilda
St. Artemas
St. Athanasius Badzekuketta
St. Atticus
St. Augulus
St. Augustine of Huy
Bl. Augustine Ota
St. Augustus Chapdelaine
St. Aurea
St. Avitus
St. Barbasymas
St. Barlaam
St. Bartholomew Alvarez
Bl. Bartholomew Gutierrez
Bl. Bartholomew Sheki
St. Barypsabas
St. Basileus
St. Basilides
St. Bebnuda (Paphnutius)
St. Belina
St. Bellinus
St. Benedict of Szkalka
St. Benignus
St. Benignus
St. Beocca
St. Bernard Due
St. Bieuzy
St. Bonaventure of Miako
St. Boniface
St. Bruno Seronkuma
St. Callinicus
Bl. Camillus Constanzi
St. Candida
St. Cantidian (Cantidus)
St. Cantidius
St. Catherine of Alexandria
St. Carterius
Bl. Carthusian Martyrs
Bl. Caspar Fisogiro
St. Cassian of Imola
St. Catulinus
St. Charalampias
Bl. Charles de Faucauld
St. Charles Lwanga and Companions
St. Cointha
St. Columba of Spain
St. Columba of Sens
St. Cominus
St. Cucuphas
St. Cuthbert Mayne
St. Dalmatius of Pavia
Bl. Damien Yamiki
St. Daniel
St. Devota
Bl. Didacus Carvalho
St. Diomedes
St. Dionysius
St. Dionysius
Bl. Dionysius Fugishima
St. Dionysius Sebuggwao
St. Dioscorides
St. Dioscorus
Dominican Martyrs of Vietnam
St. Dominic Doan Xuyen
St. Dominic Henares
Bl. Dominic Jorjes
Bl. Dominic Nakano
Bl. Dominic Nifaki
Bl. Dominic of the Holy Rosary
St. Dominic Shamada
Bl. Dominic Shibioge
St. Dominic Tuoc
St. Domnio
St. Donatus & Hilarinus
Douai Martyrs
Ebsdorf Martyrs
St. Edistius
St. Edmund the Martyr
St. Edward the Martyr
Bl. Edward Shelley
St. Eleutherius
St. Emerentiana
St. Emilian
Bl. Emmanuel d'Abreu
St. Emmanuel Phung
St. Emmanuel Trieu
St. Eoban
Ephesus Martyrs
St.Epicharis
St. Epimachus
Era of the Martyrs
St. Etherius
St. Eugenian
St. Eugraphos with Hermogenes Menas, Alexandria Martyrs
St. Eupsychius
St. Eupsychius
St. Eustace
St. Euthalia
St. Euthymius
St. Eutychius
St. Eutychius
St. Eutychius of Alexandria
Bl. Everard Hanse
St. Exuperius
St. Faustus
St. Felicissimus
St. Felix
St. Felix
St. Felix
St. Felix of Seville
St. Felix of Spoleto
St. Felix of Thynissa
Bl. Ferdinand Ayala
St. Fidelis
St. Fingar
First Martyrs of the See of Rome
St. Flavius
St. Flocellus
St. Florentius of Vienne
Martyrs Four Anonymous
Four Crowned Martyrs
St. Frances Bizzocca
Bl. Frances de Capillas
Bl. Franciscan Martyrs of China
Bl. Francis Chakichi
St. Francis de Morales
St. Francis Galvez
St. Francis Gil de Frederich
St. Francis Isidore Gagelin
St. Francis Jaccard
Bl. Francis Kuloi
Bl. Francis Kurobiove
Bl. Francis Man
St. Francis of St. Bonaventure
St. Francis of St. Mary
St. Francis of St. Michael
St. Francis Page
Bl. Francis Serrano
Bl. Francis Takea
St. Francis Trung
St. Francis Xavier Can
St. Francis Xavier Mau
St. Fraternus
St. Frugentius
St. Gabinus
St. Gabriel Taurin Dufresse
St. Gabriel Jusuke
St. Gabriel Lalement
Bl. Gabriel of St. Magdalen
St. Gaius Francis
Bl. Gaius of Korea
St. Gaudentia
St. Generosus
Bl. George Gervase
St. Germanicus of Smyrna
St. Gonclaco Garcia
St. Gonzaga Gonza
St. Gordian and Epimachus
St. Gorgias
St. Gundenis
St. Gundisalvus Garcia
St. Gunifort
St. Gyavire
St. Heliconis
Bl. Henry Abbot
St. Hermione
St. Hermogenes with Menas, & Eugraphos, Alexandria Martyrs
St. Hippolytus
St. Hippolytus
St. Hippolytus of Porto
St. Honorius
Bl. Hugh Green
Bl. Hugh More
St. Humphrey Lawrence
Bl. Humphrey Middlemore
St. Hyacinth
St. Hyacinth
St. Hyacinth Castaneda
St. Hyacinth Orfanel
St. Isaac of Cordoba
St. Isaurus
St. Ischyrion
Bl. Isabel Fernandez
Bl. James Duckett
St. Jean de Brebeuf
Bl. Jerome de Angelis
Bl. Joachim Firayama Diz
Bl. John Thules and Roger Wrenno
Bl. John Alcober
St. John Baptist Con
Bl. John Baptist Lo
St. John Baptist Machado
St. John Baptist Thanh
Bl. John Beche
St. John Boste
Bl. John Carey
St. John Charles Cornay
St. John Dat
BL. John Davy
St. John del Prado
Bl. John Duckett
Bl. John Felton
Bl. John Finch
Bl. John Forest
Bl. John Foyamon
Bl. John-Gabriel Perboyre
Bl. John Haile
St. John Hoan
St. John Houghton
Bl. John Ingram
Bl. John Kinsako
St. John Kokumbuko
Bl. John Lantrua of Triora
St. John-Louis Bonnard
Bl. John Maid
St. John Maria Muzeyi
St. John Mary Mzec
Bl. John Mason
Bl. John Naisen
Bl. John Nangata
Bl. John Nelson
St. John Nepomucene
Bl. John of Cetina
St. John of Cologne
Bl. John of Korea
St. John of Osterwick
Bl. John of Rochester
St. John Rigby
Bl. John Robinson
Bl. John Shoun
Bl. John Slade
St. John Soan de Goto
Bl. John Storey
Bl. John Tanaka
Bl. John Thorne
St. John Yano
St. Joseph Canh
Bl. Joseph Fernandez
St. Joseph Hien
St. Joseph Khang
Bl. Josephine Leroux
St. Joseph Marchand
St. Joseph Nghi
St. Joseph Nien Vien
St. Joseph of Persia
St. Joseph of St. Hyacinth
St. Joseph Peter Uyen
St. Joseph Thi
Bl. Joseph Tshang
Bl. Joseph Tshang-ta-Pong
Bl. Joseph Yuen
St. Jucundian
St. Julia
St. Julian
St. Julian of Caesarea
St. Julian of Egypt
St. Julian of Lyons
St. Julian of Sora
St. Julia of Merida
St. Julia of Troyes
St. Julius
St. Just
St. Justin
St. Justin Martyr
St. Juthware
St. Juventius
St. Kennera
St. Kizito
St. Lambert of Saragossa
St. Laura
Bl. Lawrence Humphrey
St. Lawrence Huong
St. Lawrence Imbert
Bl. Lawrence Jamada
St. Lawrence - Martyr
Bl. Lawrence PeMan
Bl. Lawrence Richardson
Bl. Lawrence Rokuyemon
St. Lorenzo Ruiz
Bl. Lawrence Shizu
St. Leo & Juliana
St. Leocadia
St. Leocrita
St. Leo Karasuma
Bl. Leo Kombiogi
Bl. Leo Nakanishi
St. Leonard Kimura
St. Leo Satsuma
Bl. Leo Suchiemon
St. Leo Tanaka
St. Longinus
Bl. Louis Baba
Bl. Louis Bertran
Bl. Louis Flores
St. Louis Ibachi
Bl. Louis Kawara
Bl. Louis Maki
Bl. Louis Naisen
St. Louis of Omura
Bl. Louis Sasanda
Bl. Louis Shakichi
Bl. Louis Someyon
Bl. Louis Sotelo
St. Lucretia
Bl. Lucy
Bl. Lucy Chakichi
Bl. Lucy de Freitas
St. Luke Banabakiutu
St. Luke Kiemon
St. Luke Loan
St. Luxorius
St. Lybe
St. Lycarion
St. Macarius
St. Macra
St. Maharsapor
St. Mamelta
Bl. Mancius Araki
Bl. Mancius of St. Thomas
Bl. Mancius of the Holy Cross
Bl. Mancius Shisisoiemon
St. Mansuetus
St. Mappalicus
Sts. Marcellinus and Peter
St. Marcian
St. Marciana of Mauretania
St. Marciana
St. Mardonius
St. Marko Krizin
St. Margaret of Antioch
Bl. Margaret Pole
St. Marianus
St. Marie Magdalen Desjardin
St. Marina
St. Marinus
St. Mark
St. Mark
Bl. Mark Barkworth
St. Martha
St. Martha Wang
St. Martina of Rome
Bl. Martin
Bl. Martin Gomez
St. Martin Loynaz of the Ascension
Martyrologium Carthaginiense
Martyrology of Tallaght
Martyrs of Alexandria
Martyrs of Amorion
Martyrs of the Serapeum
Martyrs Under the Lombards
Martyrs of the Carthusian Order
Martyrs of the Dominican Order in Vietnam
Martyrs of Africa
Martyrs of Alexandria
Martyrs of Antioch
Martyrs of Arabia
Martyrs of Ararat
Martyrs of Armenia
Martyrs of Bulgaria
Martyrs of Campania
Martyrs of Cappadocia
Martyrs of Cardena
Martyrs of Chalcedon
Martyrs of China
Martyrs of Constantinople
Martyrs of Corfu
Martyrs of Crete
Martyrs of Croyland
Martyrs of Damascus
Martyrs of Douai
Martyrs of Ebsdorf
Martyrs of Egypt
Martyrs of England
Forty Martyrs of England & Wales
Martyrs of Ephesus
Martyrs of Gorkum
Martyrs of Japan
Martyrs of Korea
Martyrs of Laval
Martyrs of Lesbos
Martyrs of London
Martyrs of Lyons
Martyrs of Mesopotamia
Martyrs of Mount Sinai
Martyrs of Nagran
Martyrs of Nicomedia
Martyrs of Orange
Martyrs of Palestine
Martyrs of Pannonia
Martyrs of Paraguay
Martyrs of Persia
Martyrs of Raithu
Martyrs of Rome
First Martyrs of Rome
Martyrs of Samosata
Martyrs of Saragossa
Martyrs of Scillitan
Martyrs of September
Martyrs of Sirmium
Martyrs of Syria
Martyrs of Tarsus
Martyrs of the Abrahamites
Martyrs of Thrace
Martyrs of Toulouse
Martyrs of Trier
Martyrs of Tyre
Martyrs of Uganda
Martyrs of Valeria
Martyrs of Vietnam
Martyrs of the Theban Legion
Bl. Mary Guengoro
Bl. Mary Magdalen Kiota
Bl. Mary Tanaura
St. Mathias Mulumba
St. Matthew Alonso Leziniana
Bl. Matthew de Eskandely
St. Matthew Phuong
Bl. Matthias Araki
St. Matthias Murumba
Bl. Matthias of Arima
St. Matthias of Meako
St. Maurus
St. Maurus & Companions
Bl. Maurus Scott
St. Mavilus
St. Maxellendis
St. Maximus
St. Maximus
St. Mbaga Tuzinde
St. Melitina
St. Mercurius
Bl. Michael Diaz
Bl. Michael Fimonaya
Bl. Michael Ghebre
St. Michael Ho-Dinh-Hy
Bl. Michael Jamada
Bl. Michael Kinoshi
Bl. Michael Kiraiemon
St. Michael Kozaki
St. Michael My
Bl. Michael Nakashima
Bl. Michael Shumpo
Bl. Michael Takeshita
Bl. Michael Tomaki
Bl. Michael Tozo
Bl. Michael Yamiki
Bl. Miguel Pro
Bl. Miles Gerard
St. Milles
Bl. Monica Naisen
St. Moses
St. Mugagga
St. Mukasa Kiriwawanyu
St. Myrope
St. Natalia of Nicomedia
St. Nemesius
St. Nicholas Pieck
St. Nicholas Poppel
St. Nicholas Tavigli
St. Octavian
St. Orestes
St. Palmatius
St. Panacea
St. Pancratius, martyred
St. Pantalus
St. Paphnutius
Bl. Patrick Salmon
Bl. Paul Navarro
Bl. Paul Sanchiki
Bl. Paul Tcheng
St. Peleusius
St. Peter
St. Peter Chanel
Bl. Peter Lieou
Bl. Peter of the Assumption
St. Philip
St. Plutarch
St. Polycarp of Alexandria
St. Polyeuctus
St. Pompeius of Pavia
St. Pontian
St. Pontius of Cimella
St. Potamioene the Younger
St. Potitus
St. Priscilla
St. Priscus
Bl. Ralph Corby
St. Reparata
St. Richard Gwyn
Bl. Richard of St. Ann
St. Richard Reynolds
Bl. Robert Sutton
St. Robert of Bury
St. Robert Southwell
St. Sabsir Martyrs
St. Sarmata
Bl. Sebastian Newdigate
Bl. Sidney Hodgson
St. Theodemir
St. Theophane Venard
Bl. Thomas Ford
Bl. Thomas Zumarraga
St. Trypbaena
St. Urban
St. Valentine Berrio-Ochoa
St. Venaranda
Bl. Vincent de Cunha
St. Vincent Kaun
St. Vincent Saragossa
Bl. Walter Pierson
St. Warinus
Bl. William Andleby
Bl. William Browne
Bl. William Dean
Bl. William Filby
Bl. William Greenwood
Bl. William Guntei
Bl. William Harcourt
Bl. William Harrington
Bl. William Hart
Bl. William Hartley
Bl. William Howard
Bl. William Ireland
Bl. William Lacey
Bl. William Marsden
Bl. William Richardson
Bl. William Ward
Bl. William Way
St. Wistan
St. Ymar
St. Zoilus


Find Saints

Catholic Online offers the largest searchable database of Catholic Saints on the internet.
Browse Saints
by Alphabet
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Patron Saints
by Alphabet
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Newsletter Sign Up


Daily Readings

Reading 1, First Corinthians 15:1-11
I want to make quite clear to you, brothers, what the message ... Read More
Psalm, Psalms 118:1-2, 16-17, 28
Alleluia! Give thanks to Yahweh for he is good, for his ... Read More
Gospel, Luke 7:36-50
One of the Pharisees invited him to a meal. When he arrived at ... Read More

Saint of the Day

September 20 Saint of the Day Sts. Andrew Kim Taegon, Paul Chong Hasang, and Companions
September 20: Feastday: September 20 The evangelization of Korea began ... Read More

Marketplace

Click Here Catholic Family Bible
Most Beautiful Catholic Bible for the reduced Price of $79.95
Read More

Click Here Padre Pio, the Man Who Knew Suffering
Follow the story of Saint Pio of Pietrelcina & trace his steps ... Read More